Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't think this is a dupe .... but if it is, well.....sorry
1 posted on 09/18/2008 8:39:58 AM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rface

The Feds are comin’

For if they don’t, it’s on to every other public official’s email, bank accounts, etc


2 posted on 09/18/2008 8:44:44 AM PDT by Principled (Vaporize the "Divide and Conquer" taxes - Have everyone pay the same marginal rate!. NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

See malkin’s page from yesterday...


3 posted on 09/18/2008 8:45:17 AM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

The Obamaniacs don’t need a warrant to tap someone’s communications. They don’t need probable cause, they don’t need judicial oversight or any national security imperative.

They just need plausible deniability.

This is what they do now before they are in office. Think about what they will do once they have control of the levers of government.


4 posted on 09/18/2008 8:46:36 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

I heard a woman on the Frank Beckman show today telling him, oh, it wasn’t anyone from the campaign. It was probably just some kid because it originally went up on a site that teens and twenties go to. Uh huh. Yeah. The Obama disinformation committee starting to crank up the machine.


8 posted on 09/18/2008 8:49:38 AM PDT by FrdmLvr ("I don't know of a single thing Obama has done except talk and write". -- Newt Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

inciting a riot is not protected free speech.


11 posted on 09/18/2008 8:52:44 AM PDT by weegee (Say no to the Marxist who "denounces" the 911 terrorist attacks and yet befriended a Pentagon bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

The MSM’s take on this has been as follows: “sure, hacking her e-mail was sorta wrong, but it brings up questions as to whether she was skirting laws by e-mailing state government officials from her personal account.” In other words, crime is justified if it bags a Republican.

Really, wouldn’t it be funny to see the MSM’s reaction if someone out there say offered a reward for hacking into the personal e-mail of someone, like say, David Gregory or Keith Olberman. It would be like a bass tourney. Come claim your reward for every MSM big wig you bag. I wonder how the MSM would feel about the crime then? Would it be sorta bad or a crime?


17 posted on 09/18/2008 9:02:11 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
These jokers think they can hide from the feds.

Message to hacker: Enjoy your time in jail.

21 posted on 09/18/2008 9:20:14 AM PDT by Nachum (Sarah Palin: Baberaham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface
The Dems create the environment which promotes this kind of behavior....
25 posted on 09/18/2008 9:33:29 AM PDT by Kimmers (Liberalism: Where fun goes to die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rface

See Michelle Malkin’s blog for a good explanation of what went on.

Somebody’s arse will be in Leavenworth...


32 posted on 09/18/2008 11:51:32 AM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D. - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson