Skip to comments.
Obama casts light on McCain's abortion stance
Town Hall ^
| Thursday, September 18, 2008
| LIZ SIDOTI
Posted on 09/18/2008 8:35:44 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
09/18/2008 8:35:44 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
So Mac is for the Feds paying for research involving harvesting of babies for their stem cells? Great nominee we have here.
2
posted on
09/18/2008 8:38:23 AM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(McCain to Obama, "You sided with those stupid conservatives to kill my amnesty!")
To: Sybeck1
Obama favors infanticide. There really is no reason to look any further than that.
3
posted on
09/18/2008 8:40:29 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(MSM Lied, Journalism Died. RIP 2008)
To: jwalsh07
It's still a soul in that petri dish IMO.
4
posted on
09/18/2008 8:42:52 AM PDT
by
Sybeck1
(McCain to Obama, "You sided with those stupid conservatives to kill my amnesty!")
To: Sybeck1
It is IMO as well. However, we save the lives of many more unborn babies with McCain as POTUS rather than the pro death Obama as POTUS. I trust in the Lord to take good care of those unborn souls.
5
posted on
09/18/2008 8:46:46 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(MSM Lied, Journalism Died. RIP 2008)
To: Sybeck1
I'll vote with just one nostril closed now, after Palin.
6
posted on
09/18/2008 8:52:27 AM PDT
by
polymuser
(Taxpayers voting for Obama are like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.)
To: Sybeck1
Great nominee we have here. So you suggest we let Obama reload the court? Our 2nd Amendment rights are just one vote away from going into the dustpile of history.
7
posted on
09/18/2008 8:52:57 AM PDT
by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: presidio9
How anyone can preach that killing babies is “right” is beyond comprehension.
8
posted on
09/18/2008 8:53:04 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
To: Sybeck1
Let’s try not to lose our focus, shall we. At Saddleback, McCain put himself on the side of adult stem cell research. I am 100% against abortion and I am 100% against embryonic stem cell research. However, I am also 100% against all types of judicial legislature, and if you are really a conservative, so should you be. Therefore, you need to understand that if Jesus Christ were our next president, he could not legally outlaw abortion in all 50 states. That would require modification of the Constitution. Becase the left is going to control Congress, that is not going to happen. What the left is generally trying to do is to put our candidates into the extrememe position on this issue. What John McCain needs to be talking about is getting rid of Roe in the terms that I just mentioned. When it is explained this way, roughly 60% of Americans agree that the decision should be made on the state levle.
9
posted on
09/18/2008 8:53:34 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(What's the difference between Global Universalists and National Exceptionalists? -The 2008 election.)
To: presidio9
McCain and Palin stand up for GOD’s LAWS... obama/biden stand up for satan and all that is EVIL!
LLS
10
posted on
09/18/2008 8:56:13 AM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims!)
To: presidio9
If you want to know what they really support, a better place to look would be the party platforms they've approved. You can find that info
here in a post I produced yesterday.
11
posted on
09/18/2008 8:56:19 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Public "servants" have decided it's their job to use the public's money to fight the public)
To: pgyanke
The link to politicalresponsibility.org does not work.
12
posted on
09/18/2008 9:01:10 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(What's the difference between Global Universalists and National Exceptionalists? -The 2008 election.)
To: presidio9
Bring it on, Mr. Infanticide.
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: jwalsh07
“Obama favors infanticide. There really is no reason to look any further than that.”
Amen to that. Obama is deceived by Satan and doesn’t even know it. He is deluded into thinking it is more important to protect abortionist doctors than innocent children - what a sick, selfish, disgusting individual.
To: presidio9
I wonder why it is that the pro-abortion position is always presented as “moderate.” And why women are always targets of such “messages.” I believe more men are pro-abortion; if a woman aborts her baby, SHE has to live with herself after that; the man can always pass whatever responsibility he has for the murder onto her shoulders. A man looking to divest himself of any responsibility for his actions simply does not have to deal with the emotional issues; it makes sense that men are more likely to support abortion.
16
posted on
09/18/2008 9:18:48 AM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: Sybeck1
So Mac is for the Feds paying for research involving harvesting of babies for their stem cells? Great nominee we have here. Johnny Mac is right on this issue I believe. The embryos from ivf and the remains of abortion should not just be thrown in the garbage. I don't believe that we should just waste them like this. We have federal funding of many other scientific endeavors, so why not this one? I support reduced federal funding across the board, but this research is far more promising than a lot of the current research being done at CDC and NIH. I believe that you can be pro-life while supporting this research. You guys can commence jumping on me now.
17
posted on
09/18/2008 9:19:14 AM PDT
by
LiberalsSpendYourMoney
(Barry, you're more racist than 99% of Americans. And you're ugly.)
To: presidio9
Thank you for telling me... it used to...?
18
posted on
09/18/2008 9:35:27 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Public "servants" have decided it's their job to use the public's money to fight the public)
To: presidio9
That’s strange... both links now try to send you to Freerepublic... how’d that happen?
19
posted on
09/18/2008 9:37:35 AM PDT
by
pgyanke
(Public "servants" have decided it's their job to use the public's money to fight the public)
To: pgyanke
Obama is against abortion, too. His view is:
“Why abort a baby in a womb where the mother could be endangered or at risk from internal bleeding? Why not just deliver the baby and beat it to a pulp with a rolling pin on the delivery room floor? That way, all you have to do is mop up...less expense.”
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson