Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: housedeep

Obama should not be this close.


11 posted on 09/18/2008 7:22:21 AM PDT by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: gathersnomoss

you mean... he should be ahead?


13 posted on 09/18/2008 7:24:48 AM PDT by drzz (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: gathersnomoss

No, he shouldnt be, but the MSM is going ape $hit at the thought of him losing. Just look at the AP story about Palin’s email this morning. Not only are they manufacturing a scandal out of it to destroy her, they wont even cooperate with the secret service.


15 posted on 09/18/2008 7:26:43 AM PDT by WallStPunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: gathersnomoss
Obama should not be this close.

He shouldn't even be in the ballgame. Neither should the North Vietnamese hero have been within 100K votes of the Oval Office four years ago. But it is what it is.

18 posted on 09/18/2008 7:31:30 AM PDT by impeachedrapist (On Free Republic PBD [political bipolar disorder] rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: gathersnomoss
Obama should not be this close.

He wouldn't if the media were not pro-marxists.

21 posted on 09/18/2008 7:34:24 AM PDT by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: gathersnomoss

RE: “Obama should not be this close.”

Something to think about on 11/4: two words — “Bradley factor”


79 posted on 09/18/2008 11:17:46 AM PDT by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson