Posted on 09/17/2008 1:50:42 PM PDT by mondoreb
Why isn't Obama denying Amir Taheri's charges?
He admited to it in June to MSNBC!
[NOTE: The New York Post's Amir Taheri, in "OBAMA TRIED TO STALL GIS' IRAQ WITHDRAWAL", "discussed how Barack Obama, during his July trip, had asked Iraqi leaders not to finalize an agreement vital to the future of US forces in Iraq - and how the effect of such a delay would be to postpone the departure of the US from Iraq beyond the time Obama himself calls for."]
We've discovered an MSNBC article which directly contradicts Obama's defense of his negotiations with the Iraq government.
Taheri layed out the Obama spin in today's followup to his Monday article:
The Obama campaign has objected [to my assertions]. While its statement says my article was "filled with distortions," the rebuttal actually centers on a technical point: the differences between two Iraqi-US accords under negotiation - the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA, to set rules governing US military personnel in Iraq) and the Strategic Framework Agreement (SFA, to settle the legal basis for the US military presence in Iraq in the months and years ahead).What did Obama himself say in June?The Obama camp says I confused the two. It continues: "On the Status of Forces Agreement, Sen. Obama has always said he hoped that the US and Iraq would complete it - but if they did not, the option of extending the UN mandate should be considered.
(Excerpt) Read more at deathby1000papercuts.com ...
Looks like Amir Taheri had his facts straight.
I wouldn’t have expected Obama to blatantly try to get Iraqi leaders to delay the agreements. His campaign’s attempts to spin this is only creating new problems.
When I clicked on this thread hoped to find this story was being covered by some of the major media. Still waiting for that to happen. Rush did call for an investigation today.
The New York Post appears to be the only ones on the story at the moment—but hopefully, that will change.
I don’t understand, the only one i heard talking about this was Laura Ingraham...Rush mentioned it, no one else...WTF
Do you guys want to win?
I forgot:
...Obama was willing to SACRIFICE the lives of AMERICAN SOLDIERS to ADVANCE his POLITICAL career....
This needs to be repeated multiple times...
This :
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
Wheres Drudge? crickets
you forgot one thing, when you reference this, you MUST end it with the following:
...Obama was willing to SACRIFICE the lives of AMERICAN SOLDIERS to ADVANCE his POLITICAL career....
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
*TREASONGATE!!!!!!!!!
That’s a good point...this won’t be the last you hear of this...at least from us.
Having covered John Edwards for 8 months when the MSM didn’t ask Edwards one single question about it was very instructive about these types of stories.
Thanks everyone for the comments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.