Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canon engineers held back by marketing department's "megapixel race"
Tech Digest via Yahoo ^ | 9.17.2008 | Duncan Geere

Posted on 09/17/2008 11:45:01 AM PDT by libh8er

Canon engineers are being held back from developing new sensor technology by marketing departments in a "race for megapixels", claims an employee of the Japanese photography company. (Advertisement)

The employee told Tech Digest that Canon have the technology to "blow the competition away" in terms of image sensors, but are instead being asked to focus on headline figures like the number of megapixels a camera has. When asked for his opinion on the Canon EOS 5D Mark II, which we covered this morning, the employee said:

"I am hugely disappointed because once again Canon engineers are dictated by their marketing department and had to keep up with the megapixel race. They have the technology to blow the competition away by adapting the new 50D sensor tech in a full frame format and just easing off a little on the megapixels. Although no formal testing has been done on the new model yet, judging by the spec and technology used, it just seems to be as good or as bad as the competition - not beating them by a mile (which we used to)."

The employee was keen to point out though that he wasn't wholly disappointed by the new model though:

"The image quality on the 5d1 was so good that it's still as good as the new NikonD700 even though the Nikon is 3 years younger. I was hoping (...) for two new cameras. One would be a 'reheated' 5D1 with a same megapixel count but a slight redesign in sensor combined with new processor and all the gadgets like micro autofocus adjustments, vignetting control, dust reduction, better weather seals and an upgrade to the autofocus."

"The other one would be a 'revolution' 5d, with a completely new sensor design (so it can actually take a lot more megapixels)

(Excerpt) Read more at uk.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: canon; digitalphotography; megapixels
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 09/17/2008 11:45:02 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libh8er
Ah, marketing vs. engineering. The age old debate.

I think a lot of engineers would put aside their grievances if some of the hot marketing chicks would go out with them, but that never seems to happen.

2 posted on 09/17/2008 11:49:05 AM PDT by TheWasteLand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

3 posted on 09/17/2008 11:49:20 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you're not part of the solution, then you must be part of the government............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWasteLand

4 posted on 09/17/2008 11:50:33 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you're not part of the solution, then you must be part of the government............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

The marketing department wants consumers to be stupid.


5 posted on 09/17/2008 11:51:05 AM PDT by weegee (Say no to the Marxist who "denounces" the 911 terrorist attacks and yet befriended a Pentagon bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Random musings from the empty corner of my head:

1. Marketing usually always wins... especially over Engineering

2. If they improved the image sensors, perhaps they wouldn’t sell as many cameras to “repeat” buyers (kinda goes along with my conspiracy theory that they could make a tire that lasts for at least 100,000 miles)

3. Maybe Marketing has determined through their research that most consumers of these devices only look skin deep when wondering what camera to buy and pixel count seems to be what everyone else is focused on (get it? focused? sorry).


6 posted on 09/17/2008 11:51:31 AM PDT by RedCell (Honor thy Father (9/6/07) - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

7 posted on 09/17/2008 11:52:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you're not part of the solution, then you must be part of the government............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheWasteLand
"I think a lot of engineers would put aside their grievances if some of the hot marketing chicks would go out with them..."

Where is their team spirit, huh?
8 posted on 09/17/2008 11:56:01 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (Palin Speaks - Results in Fear & Loathing on the Left, Rejoicing on the Right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

There has been many better products that never made it because of poor marketing.


9 posted on 09/17/2008 11:57:53 AM PDT by ThomasThomas (Real change actually changes something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Both of those are great!


10 posted on 09/17/2008 12:02:53 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedCell

“Marketing usually always wins... especially over Engineering”

Given that the goal of the company is to make money, this makes sense.

I say that as an engineer — who has had to sell things.

Yes, product and quality are important.

So is getting drunk and going to a titty bar with the guy who buys your stuff.


11 posted on 09/17/2008 12:03:19 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Wish it was Palin/McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
Some 40+ years ago when transistor radios were first being marketed, the market hype was the number of transistors in the radio. I had a friend know legible about electronics who examined some of these radios and found that in some cases “extra” transistors were simply soldered to the board and where in no way were connected to anything.
12 posted on 09/17/2008 12:04:59 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

The problem is, the more megapixels you cram into a sensor of the size required by standard lenses, the smaller the pixels have to be, and the less voltage you can accumulate in each pixel. That means that we’re approaching a point where we’ll lose dynamic range but have a really sharp picture.

When hi-tech solutions become brute force, it’s time to step back and let some new technology come in.


13 posted on 09/17/2008 12:05:56 PM PDT by SlowBoat407 (Obama will give us enough hope to hang ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
“extra” transistors were simply soldered to the board and where in no way were connected to anything.

Lol. Talk about fraud !

14 posted on 09/17/2008 12:08:11 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RedCell
My first and right now only DSLR is a Canon 20D and it has been a very good camera. For what I do, mainly virtual tour, stock submissions, some model development, and sometimes events, it does very well. It helps to be coupled to a good lens.

I hope to upgrade to maybe a 40D next year. Money is just too tight right now.

15 posted on 09/17/2008 12:08:34 PM PDT by wally_bert (Tactical Is Still Missing A Chair! Star Wreck In The Pirkinning......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Pingaling.
16 posted on 09/17/2008 12:09:48 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
"Megapixel count" -- reminds me of the early days of semiconductors -- when, "Made in Japan" was a big joke...

The Japanese got into a "transistor count" marketing race. Then folks discovered that a "nine Transistor" Japanese radio only had a couple of functional transistors -- and the rest were merely empty "cans" to up the count...

17 posted on 09/17/2008 12:12:15 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

I have a 20D too.. it rocks(!) except for the loud shutter. But if you are going to upgrade, I suggest you skip the 40d and go straight to the 50d. Price will substantially come down next year.


18 posted on 09/17/2008 12:14:18 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

“anonymous engineer” source - what BS. This is marketing generated. Guaranteed.

Actually the Foveon sensor (Fuji) is better than anything Canon or Nikon has on a pixel per pixel basis, but is hampered by other things.

This is a cheap marketing trick to trash Nikon. Shame is, both Nikon & Canon make good cameras. This sort of crap is no better than election mudslinging.


19 posted on 09/17/2008 12:15:05 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWasteLand
My marketing lead is a pudgy middle aged guy.

So I don't get that option.

Anyways...

You've all heard how necessity is the mother of invention?

What they don't tell you is that she was knocked up by a salesman.

20 posted on 09/17/2008 12:15:22 PM PDT by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson