Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why was Lehman Brothers allowed to fail
8-16-2008 | edcoil

Posted on 09/16/2008 10:44:17 AM PDT by edcoil

Since unconfirmed reports have to be placed in Vanity, I will leave it up to MODS and posters as to this classification.

I was told Lehman was not bailout like Bears because most of Lehman's portifilo was in Europe not American investments and the Fed's knew Americans would not stand for bailing out Europe.

Any of our fund managers or more experienced folks know? I was told this comment was initially on the web by our Fed Chairman however was pulled later.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: corruption; fraud; robberbarons; wallstreet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 09/16/2008 10:44:17 AM PDT by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I work as a portfolio manager for a hedge fund. Basically, what I hear is that, after bailing out the root cause of our problems—Fannie and Freddie—the Feds felt they had done plenty enough. The big players in the industry were not willing to lend ot each other and solve their own problems, so the FEds told them essentially, “Take responsibility for your own screw ups or go out of business. Your choice.”


2 posted on 09/16/2008 10:47:07 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

I heard that Lehman was down $400 billion.


3 posted on 09/16/2008 10:50:12 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

None of these greedy scum should be bailed out. They were unwilling to help those that owe them and just like in Jesus’ parable, they should reap what they have sewn.


4 posted on 09/16/2008 10:50:25 AM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

“Take responsibility for your own screw ups or go out of business. Your choice.”

Wish they’d say that to everyone. I am amazed that companies like Lehman Bros and Merril Lynch allowed themselves to be so exposed to a major credit/real estate market meltdown.


5 posted on 09/16/2008 10:51:16 AM PDT by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

I read a quote attributed to SecTreas Paulson that went like this:

“Since none of you (referring to the various banks who wanted government backstops to bid on Lehman) seem to think it worth paying up to buy Lehman on your own, we don’t see the value in it either.”

Point, set and match. I’ll have to give Paulson some credit for finally putting the issue in terms that WallSt understands, rather than the academic analysis used by Bernanke and Greenspan on why/why not a company should be backstopped.


6 posted on 09/16/2008 10:52:54 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
I don't believe that is the reason. I simply think that after having to take Fannie and Freddie, the Fed is loath to help anyone else out. They have done enough, and its time to put their foot down.

There are too many on the edge now to even suggest a bailout for any new companies, and some of them need to fail.

7 posted on 09/16/2008 10:53:17 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
The government has already helped out with Bear Stearns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

GM and Ford are looking for handouts.

Washington Mutual and AIG are in trouble.

Lehman Brothers' collapse does not directly affect the average American.

A homeowner in Kansas doesn't deposit his paycheck in his local Lehman branch.

But he may well be an AIG policy holder with his savings at Washington Mutual.

8 posted on 09/16/2008 10:54:25 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slapshot68

No credit check,no job,no down payment and a ballon payment
of 3 to 4 thousand a month.Somehow this was going to be a problem down the line!


9 posted on 09/16/2008 10:55:57 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus (( commander of the simian host))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
None of these greedy scum should be bailed out. They were unwilling to help those that owe them and just like in Jesus’ parable, they should reap what they have sewn.

In future, if you have no idea what you're talking about, it might be wisest to shut up.

I'll reiterate, since you don't seem overly bright:

In future, if you have no idea what you're talking about, it might be wisest to shut up.

10 posted on 09/16/2008 10:57:29 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
IMO Lehman brothers should have been allowed to fail. Why should the taxpayer bailout banks that make bad business decisions. I could give rat's behind how bad these idiot's on wall street are getting hit. It's the every day Joe who gets hosed every time we bailout one of these companies. I bet on horses, can the Goberment give me back my money on the races I didn't win??

Maybe these banks should stop loaning $$ to people who can't pay it back.

How come the dollar isn't tanking?? Oh yeah these pirates on Wall Street need a currency for their ill gotten booty.

McCain and Obama say we need more regulation of wall street. How about we try to enforce existing laws first??

You think we would of learned from the Enron debacle.

11 posted on 09/16/2008 11:00:25 AM PDT by skully (Sarah Palin eats babies!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Let’s see, they made bad loans and then sold these loans off and bought other peoples junk in the process and now, they want to be bailed out. What did I miss?


12 posted on 09/16/2008 11:01:05 AM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Geez, guys. Freddie Mac lost $1.3 billion in loan losses for the first 6 months of 2008. They have $35 billion in core capital. They haven’t received a cent in bailouts and won’t if they housing market stabilizes soon. So, while I don’t like F&F, you have to get your facts correct.

Lehman Bros, I agree with letting them die.

AIG. Treasury will step in since the systemic risk is REALLY LIKELY. That is, collapse of the financial system.

I am against bailouts, but if we don’t do something with AIG, returning to 1935 seems like a stiff price.


13 posted on 09/16/2008 11:01:28 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

I’ll admit I don’t fully understand the derivatives aspect to this story, but the basic story is loans were give to people who couldn’t afford them. Now the loan cannot be repaid, but the banks still own the underlying asset- the home- yes probably overvalued by 20% or so, while these loans are marked down as worthless. Eventually there must be big write-ups coming down the pike, and firms buying this stuff on the cheap will profit.

Is this the story?


14 posted on 09/16/2008 11:02:28 AM PDT by petercooper (IQ tests for all voters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

At $639 billion, Lehman’s is the largest bankruptcy filing in U.S. history—easily surpassing the Enron and WorldCom collapses combined. It also places the jobs of 26,000 employees at the storied firm in immediate jeopardy.


15 posted on 09/16/2008 11:05:37 AM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
Let’s see, they made bad loans

Lehman Brothers is not a residential mortgage lender.

and then sold these loans off

Wrong.

and bought other peoples junk in the process

What prcoess is that, O wise one? Can you explain? And what is the junk to which you are referring?

and now, they want to be bailed out

Most failing business would like a loan - GM will be receiving a $25B government loan this year. But people prefer to describe bankers as greedy, not union bosses.

What did I miss?

Clearly every session of Finance 101.

16 posted on 09/16/2008 11:05:47 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skully; All

AIG might get a bailout or part bail-out so it still goes back to did Lehman not get bailed out due to its European business or what did not the EEC bail out Lehman.

They were just looking for a bridge loan.


17 posted on 09/16/2008 11:06:46 AM PDT by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Forget about forgiveness. Jesus was into torturing greedy scum, apparently.


18 posted on 09/16/2008 11:07:14 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

I’ve said this on other threads and I will say it again here. I believe part of this can be laid right at Dick Fuld’s feet. He was an arrogant, ham fisted jerk and all of Wall Street knew it. Nobody felt so inclined to step up and help Dick down from the ledge he put himself on. I think most of Wall Street knew he had several chances to make a deal and his arrogance prevented him from doing that. As I understand it, as the largest shareholder, he has lost $500MM in assets this past year. You gotta love that. Payback? Oh yeah, she’s a real b*tch.


19 posted on 09/16/2008 11:07:53 AM PDT by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: petercooper
Eventually there must be big write-ups coming down the pike, and firms buying this stuff on the cheap will profit.

Eventually there will be write-ups on a number of the mortgage securities. Problem really was in the derivatives built off of the underlying mortgage securities, that banks owned in huge size under the asinine assumption that homeowner defaults would not be correlated and that interest rates would remain at all time lows.

Question is whether you can afford to sit with them or not. There are pressures on people who manage money to make moderate profits right now, not colossal profits 3 years from now.

20 posted on 09/16/2008 11:08:15 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo (You can put lipstick on a donkey, but it's still just a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson