Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Please, Bernanke DO NOT Cut Rates! And Tell Greenspan to SHUT UP!
nolanchart.com ^ | 09-16-08 | Natalie Schultz

Posted on 09/16/2008 2:59:19 AM PDT by bugseye

The Dow fell 500 points in the last hour of trading today. It's about time! Fed funds futures are now pricing in an 86% chance the fed will cut rates tomorrow. Why? Because traders and investors on Wall Street want a "psychological lift" to prevent the market from falling even more. Well, too bad! The current rate is only 2% - already way too low. The Fed must sit tight at least until March of next year. The fact is, the market should have taken a dive over a year ago, but the Fed and our government have been artificially propping it up this whole time. Had our government not bailed out Bear Sterns, maybe, just maybe, reality would have set in and all these other firms would have taken action to stem their losses.

Thankfully we did not bail out Lehman Brothers. Sorry, but the American taxpayers should NOT be paying for the STUPIDITY and GREED of the banking sector. Let them go bankrupt; making the taxpayers pay for irresponsible industry practices is just unfair. As for AIG, Governor Patterson did the right thing (surprisingly) by allowing them to shift their assets. But, we do not need another bailout.

The Fed has increased liquidity to the market and even lowered the collateral required for cash loans. Firms had better start taking advantage of this, because so far they have been holding out, allowing themselves to fall further and further behind, all in anticipation of a government bailout. Well, the Free Lunches are OVER!

If the fed cuts rates tomorrow, our economy will go into an irreversible tailspin. The Dollar has finally started to level off BECAUSE rates have not been cut.

(Excerpt) Read more at nolanchart.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; govwatch; housingbubble
>>'...This economic disaster was started by Alan Greenspan back in the late 1990's. He just could not stop himself from cutting rates...' >>'...The housing and credit crisis never would have occurred if it wasn't for the Clinton Administration. Then Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Andrew Cuomo loosened mortgage lending regulations (Freddy and Fannie) and even legalized giving kick-backs to brokers...'
1 posted on 09/16/2008 2:59:20 AM PDT by bugseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bugseye

Agree 100% with this article. I don’t think the gov’t should have provided financing for the Bear Stearns buyout, either. The Fannie and Freddie takeover was probably unavoidable, however.


2 posted on 09/16/2008 3:04:18 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

There should be a deal for Fed Chairmen. We will give them tremendous power, prestige and riches while they serve, but on the day they retire, we take them and fling them off a cliff into the sea.

You would still have no problem recruiting for the position, and you would be spared confounding influence of interference by the retired Chairmen on the economy.


3 posted on 09/16/2008 3:06:01 AM PDT by gridlock (The Donks attacked motherhood. Now if they will just attack baseball and apple pie, we're all set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

Cuomo did not loosen mortgage lending regulations. The requirement that lenders to give substandard loans was a tightening of lending regulations by introducing racial and income quotas.

Without this regulation, these loans would never have occurred. It is a misnomer to say these substandard loans were the result of “loosened” regulation.


4 posted on 09/16/2008 3:08:34 AM PDT by gridlock (The Donks attacked motherhood. Now if they will just attack baseball and apple pie, we're all set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
There should be a deal for Fed Chairmen. We will give them tremendous power, prestige and riches while they serve, but on the day they retire, we take them and fling them off a cliff into the sea. You would still have no problem recruiting for the position, and you would be spared confounding influence of interference by the retired Chairmen on the economy.

You could make the same argument for President. (chuckle)

5 posted on 09/16/2008 3:08:35 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bugseye
CUT INTEREST RATES 1/2%
CUT IT NOW!
6 posted on 09/16/2008 3:09:45 AM PDT by kcm.org (DRILL LOS ANGELES--DRILL NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcm.org

Attempting to borrow out of this morass is making things worse.


7 posted on 09/16/2008 3:27:22 AM PDT by Chucky is a girlie man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oblomov
Totally agree. But, after things stabilize, Fannie & Freddie need to be wound down to a point where they canbe sold off into themarket.

As to Greenspan, he needs to shut up and go away, and the sooner the better.

8 posted on 09/16/2008 3:32:01 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bugseye
The housing and credit crisis never would have occurred if it wasn't for the Clinton Administration. Then Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Andrew Cuomo loosened mortgage lending regulations (Freddy and Fannie) and even legalized giving kick-backs to brokers...'

Bravo! for asserting so succinctly the truth in this matter. Last evening, I could only stomach listening to some econ talking heads for a few minutes before turning the telly off. And these were "econs" with "credentials". pffft.

One commentator disparaged President Bush as praising the fact that homeownership was up. Well, dangit, it IS up - and especially so for those who have the income and good credit to qualify for the loans. Did she make reference to this? Non! She probably follows the lefty econ logic of "separate but equal". She was obviously, deliberately ignoring the details of statistics. And she's "credentialed". snort.

9 posted on 09/16/2008 3:32:15 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

Monetary policy can only go so far! Fiscal policy has been missing in action! We need to cut taxes and cut spending and let the folks keep more of their money!


10 posted on 09/16/2008 3:35:47 AM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

And the lenders that actually followed these regulations are now “predatory”.


11 posted on 09/16/2008 3:35:56 AM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bugseye
The greater fool balloon just needs one more puff to take us out over the deflationary precipice.
12 posted on 09/16/2008 3:52:55 AM PDT by Theophilus (Abortion: 9/11 Every Single Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

Then as energy costs began to escalate Greenspan thought it the perfect time to raise interest rates.

The man needs to be called out. There are those in the media who have laid this disaster at the feet of Greenspan but for the most part the rest of the LIARS in the msm are praising him because he is constantly talking down the economy and he referred to President Bush as the worst president and Bill Clinton as the best.


13 posted on 09/16/2008 4:01:25 AM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

I’ve been posting the links to these two relative articles lately as the first is prophetic in that it was written in 1993, and the latter in July of 2008. I find them quite interesting.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n25_v45/ai_14779796

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1965239/posts


14 posted on 09/16/2008 4:10:40 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will, they ALL have Fairies livin' in their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

The economy is slowing. Inflation is not out of control. Ben will cut and Ben will be right to do so.


15 posted on 09/16/2008 4:16:50 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

“Bad trade deals and our national deficit fall on the hands of both Parties.”

And the final sentence of the article just dropped in with no comment. But maybe once the subprime debacle is cleaned up to the extent possible, and a few others, maybe it will begin to dawn on all the financial geniuses who caused all this that it really isn’t a good idea to enter into one trade agreement after another that does little more than move jobs out of the US and push our trade deficit higher and higher, last seen to be approaching a Trillion per year.


16 posted on 09/16/2008 4:59:19 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

I agree with the article, but I’m convinced that the US economy needs a total shake-out, which is why I’d prefer to see a complete collapse. The only way that will happen is for interest rates to continue to drop, inflation to spiral out of control, and the Fed Reserve destroyed once and for all. In the meantime, reinvest in gold and silver (which has been waaay oversold lately); commodities will come roaring back. Not until the dollar is utterly devalued with the public finally understand the futility of central planning.


17 posted on 09/16/2008 5:20:48 AM PDT by Ilya Mourometz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bugseye

Greenspan is married to what’s her name. That reporter with the little body, oversized head. You know, the one that hates McCain/Palin. So you know she’s instructed bubble boy to make Republicans look bad.


18 posted on 09/16/2008 6:09:36 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Conceal carry - Don't leave home without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chucky is a girlie man
Gentle Ben did NOT cut the 50 basis points and what happened yesterday!

Greed and fear, Chucky, 50 basis points all of us can understand, and gets the greed flowing.

19 posted on 09/18/2008 3:56:22 AM PDT by kcm.org (DRILL LOS ANGELES--DRILL NOW!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson