Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater
"1) Why wasn’t this a huge deal when it happened in June?"

Because it's Barack Hussein Obamassiah. The DNC and their dogs in the media threw the Clintons under the bus for him, and, despite my complete dislike of either Clinton, their treatment was disgraceful, but who cares when you have a dark horse with bi-tone rainbows and iconoc, Che-looking campaign imagery?

"2) What exactly is the big deal with regards to what’s stated in this article?"

The policy we was discussing without permission was above his pay grade. WAY above. That's why he needs permission. It's above his pay grade.

"3) How is this anywhere near as outrageous as that SOB trying to stall troop reductions for his own political gain?"

It's related to him trying to stall them, took place at around the same time; it's just further confirmation that the things he now says he didn't say, he DID, in fact say he said. Before he said he didn't say them.

108 posted on 09/15/2008 7:37:06 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Terrorist organizations worldwide endorse Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: cake_crumb
Thank you for your reply.

Because it's Barack Hussein Obamassiah. The DNC and their dogs in the media threw the Clintons under the bus for him, and, despite my complete dislike of either Clinton, their treatment was disgraceful, but who cares when you have a dark horse with bi-tone rainbows and iconoc, Che-looking campaign imagery?

Granted, the DBM have been embarrassing in their coverage of this clown, but they did write this article. We knew he talked about this crap, but how was this any different from any of those other idiot Senators/Representatives going overseas and "holding talks" with the leaders of other countries? Is it completely inappropriate? Absolutely. Is it unprecedented? Unfortunately, no.

The policy we was discussing without permission was above his pay grade. WAY above. That's why he needs permission. It's above his pay grade.

Absolutley, without question, you're correct, but, as stated above, Congress has been doing this for years now.

It's related to him trying to stall them, took place at around the same time; it's just further confirmation that the things he now says he didn't say, he DID, in fact say he said. Before he said he didn't say them.

That does clarify things. I didn't realize he was completely denying talking to other countries' leaders. That was stupid. You'd think the libs would be on to the idea of "internet searches" by now...

128 posted on 09/16/2008 4:20:22 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (How 'bout a magic trick? I'm gonna make this pencil disappear...Ta-dah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson