The magazine is responsible for what it buys and publishes not the sub-contractors. The editors aren’t blind are they? But Atlantic Monthly has been publishing more biased stuff for decades than badly lighted pictures so where is their complaint?
The magazine is responsible for what it buys and publishes not the sub-contractors. The editors aren’t blind are they? But Atlantic Monthly has been publishing more biased stuff for decades than badly lighted pictures so where is their complaint?
You’re right. THEY had to have checked that picture out and seen the additional pictures taken before they chose the cover with red eyes and skin...and very unflattering. I am glad they are getting exposed. Thanks for posting...I hope they get their pants sued off!!! AND no one buys their magazine.
Exactly. Aren’t editors suppose to proof copy before publication? The buck stops with them - it is their fault for hiring this evil woman and not checking her work.