Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye; Zakeet

On what grounds would they sue her? She had every reasonable expectation that she was following their editorial policy and the standards they have set over the years.

I watched the Editor on Fox this morning and he has NOT paid this photographer was devastated at what she did, or at least acted like it, and he said he was talking to attorneys about suing her. He said she had done other work and was not familar with how bias she was. Fox announcer questioned that since she was able to google and see her work in the Dem party wondered why they would have hired her to photograph McCain. The photographer has McCains picture on her website looking spooky and I am just glad she is getting exposed for what she did and I hope they sue her for millions. That cover is not good, supposedly she made him red, including his eyes looked red. It’s so sad what that party will do ...they are evil, especially when losing. Losers...


44 posted on 09/15/2008 5:16:12 PM PDT by IndianPrincessOK (McCain/Palin...2 pit bulls, one with lipstick! Pigs will fly with lipstick Nov. 4th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: IndianPrincessOK

The magazine is responsible for what it buys and publishes not the sub-contractors. The editors aren’t blind are they? But Atlantic Monthly has been publishing more biased stuff for decades than badly lighted pictures so where is their complaint?


47 posted on 09/15/2008 5:43:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Buckhead of the Bikini-clad Barracuda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson