Personal feelings aside, The Atlantic cannot afford NOT to chastise this “artiste”. She was on THEIR dime taking pictures for THEIR story. You can imagine the possible consequences on getting future interviews if their interviewees are trashed like that.
True. They may also have learned something from the USWeekly disaster, which is: don't try to defend this cr*p; just go out and apologize for it before thousands of Americans call your advertisers who, in turn, can and will make your life a living hell.
True. They may also have learned something from the USWeekly disaster, which is: don't try to defend this cr*p; just go out and apologize for it before thousands of Americans call your advertisers who, in turn, can and will make your life a living hell.
“Personal feelings aside, The Atlantic cannot afford NOT to chastise this “artiste”. She was on THEIR dime taking pictures for THEIR story. You can imagine the possible consequences on getting future interviews if their interviewees are trashed like that.”
EXACTLY! — She was working for THEM, taking pictures for THEIR magazine. They paid for her services, and it’s THEIR reputation that’s taken a hit by her disgusting and irresponsible behavior, because who’s going to trust them in the future to sit for a cover photo without remembering THIS?
I’m no lawyer, but I doubt, legally, that she had the right to do what she did, since I assume the rights to any photos she took belong to the magazine. If I were the magazine, I would also sue her until she’s worth about as much as Obama’s hut-brother.
I think Jill just sunk The Atlantic...and they know it.
NONE of this would have matter to Atlantic .. her doing it was ok; bragging about it online was what hunger her.