Posted on 09/15/2008 9:54:40 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
NEW YORK (CBS) - A new set of potential problems in Rep. Charles Rangel's financial papers has prompted the tax-writing lawmaker to decide to hire a forensic accounting expert to try to unravel the mess.
Rangel, chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, is already the subject of ethics committee investigations on several fronts, including unreported income and unpaid taxes on his beach house in the Dominican Republic.
Despite Republican calls for Rangel to be stripped of his Ways and Means Committee chairmanship, a spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told CBS 2 HD it is not going to happen.
Those issues and others have led the New York Democrat to choose to hire an expert to pore over Rangel's finances over the past 20 years, and issue a report to the House ethics committee. The congressman has not yet enlisted someone for the task.
Rangel's lawyer, Lanny Davis, said the move shows Rangel "has nothing to hide and does not believe he has done anything intentionally wrong."
The accountant's report will not be reviewed by Rangel or his advisers before it is given to the committee "as quickly as possible," Davis said.
The lawmaker also promised that once the report is complete, he will publicly release his tax returns for the past 20 years.
The tax issue is particularly embarrassing for a lawmaker whose job is to guide new tax law. Rangel is resisting calls from Republicans that he should lose his committee post, among the most coveted on Capitol Hill.
As more questions have been raised about Rangel's records, his lawyers and accountants have uncovered new discrepancies in the personal financial disclosure documents that he files every year to Congress.
Every lawmaker is required to file such paperwork disclosing major assets.
Rangel said in a statement he became aware of the issues over the weekend while working with his attorneys and staff. "While over the years I delegated to my staff the completion of my annual House financial disclosure statements, I had the ultimate responsibility. I owed my colleagues and the public adherence to a higher standard of care not only as a member of Congress but even more as the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee," he said.
Among the new discrepancies:
--Rangel's papers over the past 10 years show no reference to the sale of a home he once owned on Colorado Avenue in Washington.
--The details of a property bought in Sunny Isles, Fla., are bewildering at best. The stated value changes significantly from year to year, and even page to page, from $50,000 to $100,000 all the way up to $500,000.
--Some of the entries for investment funds fluctuate strangely, suggesting that the person either didn't have accurate information or didn't fill out the paperwork correctly.
Rangel spent the past week trying to answer questions about his ethics and his finances.
He acknowledged that he owes the Internal Revenue Service about $5,000 in back taxes for unreported income from the rental of his vacation villa, and probably a smaller amount to state and city tax collectors.
The congressman acknowledged he made mistakes but said they were errors of omission and should not lead to the loss of his high position in Congress.
The home in the Dominican Republic has proven a major embarrassment to the 78-year-old Rangel, who conceded he never reported the rental income over a 20-year period, received a no-interest mortgage on the place for more than half that time and claims to have no idea what it is worth today.
The ethics committee is also investigating Rangel's rental of three rent-stabilized apartments in his home district of Harlem, as well as his use of official congressional stationery to try to find private donors for a college center named after the lawmaker.
Its time for the Republicans to use this as a campaign issue.
I agree. This is an OUTRAGE!
Obviously, in Pelosi’s world, “ethics” only apply to Republicans.
banks and brokerages getting clobbered ,, rangel stays
foreclosure rates at record heights ,, dodd stays
Countrywide, Pelosi and the Dems
have sure delivered, huh?
Ha, ha, Rangel hired a forensics accounting expert? First the guy had to sign a form agreeing to disable his “ethics-ometer”.
For 20 years Rangel never reported rental income. And he calls it an error of omission.
It’s known as income tax evasion in the US Code, a felony. But to Rangel, and his flunkies in the press it’s an error of omission. Of course, to the average taxpayer...
He’ll skate.
Uhh, Nancy. Didn't you promise that you'd lead the most ethical Congress ever and rid it of anyone who would compromise Congressional integrity? Here's your chance, you lying POS.
not a swamp worth draining huh nance?
not a swamp worth draining huh nance?
I wonder how much a forensics accounting expert makes an hour?
not cheap, I’m sure. The dems are loaded, they can afford it.
Good Ol' Lanny Davis to the rescue.
-PJ
Stevens gets a raid; Rangel gets a new accountant and Lanny Davis. What gives? Does Bush still have any sway at justice, or did the Dems take that over, too?
Nancy is just representing her congressional district and their San Francisco values.
‘Rat Crime Syndicate operative. Witness his contortions, enablers, co-conspirators.
Nancy is just representing her congressional district and their San Francisco values.
Yes. We should stop calling for Pelosi to act. Instead, the RNCC should start running ads in EVERY contested district, about the new “culture of corruption”.
Include EVERYTHING. Rangel’s problems should be on top. But also Jefferson. And Murtha with is “top ranking” in sleaze.
And don’t forget the guy who WAS forced from his leadership position last year (See, I forgot his name, think it started with an “M”, but not sure).
Include Schumer taking down a bank with his comments as well.
Include millions of dollars from collapsed businesses Freddie Mae and Fannie Mac.
We could gain house seats this election. Let’s make sure people remember why they threw us out, and realise that the democrats have done nothing to make it better.
That way, when we bang the “drill here” drum, people will already be predisposed to go back on their 2006 choices.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.