Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Disrespectful Behavior at Ground Zero
Family Security Matters ^ | 9/15/2008 | Ben Shapiro

Posted on 09/15/2008 2:00:31 AM PDT by markomalley

It is difficult to screw up an appearance at Ground Zero on September 11th. You have to be either completely oblivious or completely indifferent. It is a signal feat of idiocy.

And yet Barack Obama accomplished it.

John McCain and Obama visited Ground Zero together. Obama and McCain entered the site. But while McCain took the time to shake hands with uniformed firefighters and a construction worker with an American flag helmet, Obama ignored them and stood around.

But he wasn’t done yet. Both McCain and Obama brought roses to place on the makeshift 9/11 memorial. Obama casually tossed his rose on the memorial, looking somewhat like Don Barzini tossing a rose on Don Corleone’s grave near the end of Godfather I. McCain and his wife, by contrast, approached the memorial gingerly, then placed the roses with care on the memorial. In case you were wondering, Michelle Obama was back in Chicago tending to the children – she somehow has time to accompany Barack to the DNC, but not to Ground Zero on September 11th.

Small gestures matter in large campaigns. That’s why Obama reversed himself on wearing an American flag pin. That’s why John McCain takes care with how he hugs Sarah Palin. In a campaign, everything is analyzed, re-analyzed, and over-analyzed.

And that’s why Obama’s flower-tossing exhibition matters. It demonstrates a lack of concentration, a lack of respect. Most of all, it displays no reverence. Perhaps Obama feels reverence. But his behavior at Ground Zero didn’t show that. Instead, it showed a man so concerned with himself that he wasn’t willing to take the time to shake hands with the “little people” or bend down to lay a rose on a monument.

That self-concern is at the center of Obama’s polling free fall. He has ranged far afield, away from policy and toward personal combat. He has done that because he cannot stand being personally affronted.

Sarah Palin attacked Obama’s community organizing. Obama responded by sending out his minions to talk about how Jesus was a community organizer and Pontius Pilate a governor. Meanwhile, he blundered into the “lipstick on a pig” controversy.

Obama attacked McCain on education. McCain responded with an ad accusing Obama of supporting comprehensive sex education for kindergarteners in Illinois. Obama came back with an ad talking about how McCain is old and doesn’t use e-mail.

The common thread is this: when attacked substantively, Obama counters personally. He gets angry, and he gets mean. He has read his own press clippings, and he believes them. He is The One. No one is allowed to attack him.

There are only two problems with such hubris. One is that Americans don’t like it. Arrogance bugs us. Ask John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.

The other problem is that when you believe yourself to be a messianic figure, you have to live up to that image – and you are bound to fail. Presidential politics is a game of attacks and counter-attacks, feints and bluffs, insults and retorts. It cannot be won up in the clouds – it has to be won in the mud. Even if your image demands that you remain the clouds, you will be brought down into the mud.

And so we see the new Barack Obama. The new Obama is no longer the “united we stand,” rhetoric-blowing giant. He is now the street-smart Chicago politician willing to unsheathe the knife on occasion. Only he’s not that street-smart, and it shows. Obama vowed to bring a gun to a knife-fight. Americans are beginning to realize that Obama’s gun is filled with water.

Obama’s behavior at the 9/11 memorial, then, represented two impulses. First, there was the anger of walking down to the memorial with the man who was sinking his highfalutin’ aspiration’. Second, there was the inability to bend down, even for a memorial.

And that betrays a disturbing lack of self-knowledge and self-restraint.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 7thanniversary; 911memorial; groundzero; obama; obamabiden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: REPANDPROUDOFIT

Why would any firefighter at Ground Zero offer a pin to someone that gave a speech following 9/11 that basically said America was a fault?

I wouldn’t have given ZERO anything either.


61 posted on 09/15/2008 7:29:17 AM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Of course you saw no fault with Obama’s behaviour.

Hi Carly,

I am a staunch John McCain/Sarah Palin supporter. Again, I watched the complete video. I simply saw nothing wrong in the behavior of either candidate. First I see them speaking to some people. One of them hands each of them a flower. Then, they place the flowers on the memorial and spend a moment of silence at the site. Then, I see both of them shaking hands, hugging, speaking reassurances with many of the first responders. One man offers McCain some kind of lapel pin - I can't tell what. Someone here says that Mrs. McCain was offered one also. I can't see that in the video. Supposedly, Obama was not offered one.

You suggest that I should find fault with Obama's actions. I am just saying that the video doesn't sustain the accusations.

62 posted on 09/15/2008 7:29:28 AM PDT by REPANDPROUDOFIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT

You watched the video. I watched in real time.

Obama had attitude and it showed. I will not presume to know why but it was there. He was not composed and it came off as disrespectful.


63 posted on 09/15/2008 8:08:03 AM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: giotto
The more I see of this kind of tone-deaf faux pas committed by Obama, the more convinced I am that he’s a figurehead put forward and propped up by entities who stand to gain by his winning this election.

Yeah--classic definition of a post turtle.

64 posted on 09/15/2008 10:35:38 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: REPANDPROUDOFIT

See post #19.


65 posted on 09/15/2008 2:49:34 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
I'm too ignorant to ping so I had to resort to this, yes my pathetic cyber skills show up again...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2083241/posts

The link is to an article that claims to prove Russian armor had entered Georgia a full day before the claimed provocation.

66 posted on 09/16/2008 9:57:12 AM PDT by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Camel Joe

Looks like Russian intelligence was right.


67 posted on 09/16/2008 1:35:29 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson