if both your pay has gone up then it should even out unless one of you passes a benchmark level and the other doesnt
It's arbitrary because we are beyond the tables, and you never know what kind-of judge you are going to get. Also, when we were divorcing, he cut his work hours in half and then worked an under-the-table job to supplement his personal income. They wouldn't look at his past income and only looked at his last couple month's paychecks. (I initially had a great lawyer, and he had a surgery that went bad and medically retired right after my first hearing, leaving me with a weak replacement.) I wouldn't put that past him again. I figure it's not worth the effort. It's easier for me to work overtime, and his support just supplements our grocery money.
I guess if I take one lesson away from this thread it is “don’t get married.”
In Florida the tables used to go ato around 260K and then it was a fixed percentage...low....for each child over the established table limit
fathers should always stay involved regardless