Posted on 09/13/2008 2:44:44 PM PDT by Delacon
good work!
Jerks.
ABC should have shown it unedited. This will be picked at all week.
gibson...pompous you know what.
Thanks for the transcript!
I wonder if Gibson has asked Obama to explain his connection to the weather underground member, and ask him why he has kept in contact until recently.
The media could end Obama’s candidacy any time they want to. So far they have found it more important to destroy a V.P. nominee that to take to task a man who could actually be the President.
Gibson destroyed his credibility in this series of interviews with Palin. I no longer have any respect for him.
I watched about 5 minutes of this crappy editing job and reading your post I remembered how her (edited)answers didn’t even seem to make sense for what was asked.
The one I remember was when @$$bag Gibson asked about her and her international experience.
Honestly, whoever edited that should (in a fair world) be run out of town for impersonating someone who knew how to edit video.
Horrible job and truly reflects the times we face. It is now or never, us against them. The old media needs to move on out to pasture and die.
In other words, you could probably say that Charlie’s “interview” was sort of “Photoshopped” by the abc editors.
ABC also not only edited the interview for content, but, they also blatantly edited the visuals in a manner which would create a negative reaction among some viewers:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2081027/posts
Nastiness. Just wrong. The whole presentation of this interview and the editing comes very, very close to the edge of being looked at from a campaign finance reform legal perspective.
I also think of the hate, disgust, and attacking anger Barbara Walters had towards John McCain. These people are horrendous and are not journalists at all. The are partisan hacks that have zero objectivity and balance in their media presentations. JOKE! But then again we all know this just needed to get it off my chest.
Excellent.
Attaboy.
It was done on purpose...see #12.
Freepers always find out.....thankfully!!!!
Yes. Good work! “Charlie” Gibson either fed or concocted questions meant to try to make Governor Palin look silly. No matter how she had answered any of his questions, she could have no acceptable answer for the Interrogator. IF she had answered, humbly as “Charlie” suggesed she SHOULD have done, “Well, golly gee, Charlie, yep, I certainly hesitated because we all know I’m just a little girl from the backwoods backwater, an unimportant state, and not near up to the standards of HRC and her Clinton coattails Senate seat and expensive designer suits! Nope. I ain’t noways worthy, so you’re right, I should jes’ bow out now since you put it that clear to me.”
Then the faux folksy “Charlie” could have turned to the camera in his “important” looking reading glasses and declared “Well, you heard it first here. She quits!”
As it happened in “Charlie’s” worst nightmare, the “girl from the backwoods backwater” had “hubris”. I always wondered what that word meant, “Charlie”. Now I know exactly what it means. It means “TESTICLES”, but then YOU wouldn’t know, “Charlie”, would you?
ABC got really high ratings for this hatchet job because of the interest in Sarah by the public. A few of their jealous competitors are going to pick up on this and criticize them. If the McCain camp owns their own video of this interview, they can give their competitors access.
Wouldn't that be interesting? Hopefully, something like that will happen.
They won’t be able to edit her words during the VP debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.