And Pilosi says they want to instill a "Fairness Doctrine....."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: MindBender26
What’s worse for them is that Palin didn’t whine about being a victim. She answered the questions and didn’t talk about how unfair everyone is to her. This is one of her outstanding qualities.
75 posted on
09/12/2008 2:27:34 PM PDT by
yazoo
To: MindBender26
Gibson is as sleazy as the rest at ABCCBSNBC, Euro wannabe’s all. They don’t like America or Americans. They yearn to be Social Euros.
In 1776, they would have supported King George III.
79 posted on
09/12/2008 2:45:04 PM PDT by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
To: MindBender26
Ms Palin is a newcomer to the national political sceneThat should be Mrs Palin.
81 posted on
09/12/2008 2:57:52 PM PDT by
dfwgator
( Go OSU, beat USC!)
To: MindBender26
Took some kind of hubris to conduct the interview that way, Charlie.
To: MindBender26
I have never been able to figure out how Gibson got anywhere in the industry. He's always come off as a prissy smart alec who is above it all.
Having said that, I am perplexed by this article's point of view. The interview wasn't THAT awful in terms of fairness, and we shouldn't want Palin to be protected from tough questioning. The only reason to fear boobs like Gibson is if we suspect she really isn't up to the challenge. I think she proved she is. I'm sure Palin shrugged off Charlie's little gotcha session, and we shouldn't start bleating like the DUmmies. Conservatives will always be on the short end of the "double standard" stick; whining about it only makes us look weak. I bet Palin isn't whining about it.
86 posted on
09/12/2008 10:02:32 PM PDT by
Darkwolf377
(Sarah Palin--the man Biden and Obama wish they could be.)
To: MindBender26
I'm surprised as possible that there are any in the media who noticed an apparent bias.
Nothing else coming out of the media would make me believe being unbiased was ever a concern of theirs.
89 posted on
09/12/2008 10:36:10 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
To: MindBender26
Thanks MB26. I was hoping to get your take on the ‘interview’.
94 posted on
09/13/2008 10:59:54 AM PDT by
TexasNative2000
(Obviously, liberals can't handle a strong, independent woman.)
To: MindBender26
Thanks, great piece. I often wonder if anybody in the MSM is disgusted by the behavior of the majority of their peers. As for Gibson, he's just some talking head who happened to be there when everybody ahead of him in line died or retired. He's a good example of the downside of seniority. No convictions, no inner principles, just a clerk who got promoted. Kind of like drunken weatherman Jack Cafferty, who I suspect CNN keeps around for his “Cute curmudgeon” schtik.
To: MindBender26
I wish someone could post a pic of Gibson’s ABC NEWs staff.
There is one of Brian Williams staff in Vogue.
around 20 folks....all women, one homosexual man......about 40% black women and several lesbians
no wonder...this is who determines news in most media today and they get cornfed pecekrwoodmen and women to read it for us...
it’s pure propaganda more often than not
*McGowan/Coloring the News
97 posted on
09/13/2008 11:32:26 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(Obama/Pol Pot 2008)
To: MindBender26
Charlie's snide, condescending remarks, and the substance that was left on the cutting room floor didn't accomplish what Gibson set out to do: to destroy Sarah Palin. As a matter of fact, I think SHE ATE HIS LUNCH.
As for her castrating the leftist press, you can't cut what was never there. All Palin has done is expose them for the knobless crybabies they have always been. Sarah, YOU GO!! Woot, woot!!
98 posted on
09/13/2008 12:26:28 PM PDT by
redhead
(Wasilla is on the map, and we are NOT happy about it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson