You'd better be, because Ramos and Compean were not convicted based on Sutton's testimony to Congress. Which places you in the difficult position of arguing that the 5th Circuit did not repeat Sutton's lies because it ignored them.
Well, DUH!!!!
Which places you in the difficult position of arguing that the 5th Circuit did not repeat Sutton's lies because it ignored them.
Why would I try to argue your silly strawman. That's your convoluted thought, not mine.