Well, DUH!!!!
Which places you in the difficult position of arguing that the 5th Circuit did not repeat Sutton's lies because it ignored them.
Why would I try to argue your silly strawman. That's your convoluted thought, not mine.
It not a strawman, by the simple fact that Ramos and Compean are not in prison because of Sutton's testimony to Congress.
Remember the mental vapor-lock I induced in the other guy when I accepted his central premise? Let's accept yours, now. Let's assume that Sutton perjured himself before Congress. Are Ramos and Compean still in prison? If so, why?