[calcowgirl]

The 5th Circuit didn’t repeat Sutton’s lies. I’m speaking of his testimony to Congress that was filled with ‘mistruths’ as you might like to call them.

[1rudeboy]

I’m speaking of his testimony to Congress that was filled with ‘mistruths’ as you might like to call them.

You'd better be, because Ramos and Compean were not convicted based on Sutton's testimony to Congress. Which places you in the difficult position of arguing that the 5th Circuit did not repeat Sutton's lies because it ignored them.

[Bob J]

“I’m speaking of his testimony to Congress that was filled with ‘mistruths’ as you might like to call them.”

And how many votes did Congress get on that jury?