With Sutton's perjury, his lying prosecutors, the incompetent investigator, the smear attacks on Ramos and Compean, how can one come to the conclusion that this was anything other than an unethical and malicious prosecution?
“Didn’t an attorney from Sutton’s office tell the 5th Circut court that had Ramos and Compean reported the shooting, they would have not been prosecuted?”
He said “might have not”. What he was referring to is that if R&C had not attempted a cover up and instead come clean about the shooting up front with their supervisors, they wouldn’t have looked so guilty and might have gotten off with it just being bad judgement and not gone to jail.
But they certainly would have lost their jobs and never worked in law enforecement again.
But thanks again for mistating what someone said. If you all didn’t have diversion, misstating, misrepresenting, illogic, ignorance and your pure glee that an illegal alien got shot you’d have, well, just what you have now...nothing.
I think that your problem isn't that you "came to" the conclusion by weighing the evidence, but rather that you "came to" the evidence with your conclusion in hand.
I remember the statement but I don't remember who said it, or when.
With Sutton's perjury, his lying prosecutors, the incompetent investigator, the smear attacks on Ramos and Compean, how can one come to the conclusion that this was anything other than an unethical and malicious prosecution?
Easy. Just ignore the facts and become a Sutton mouthpiece.