I remember the statement but I don't remember who said it, or when.
With Sutton's perjury, his lying prosecutors, the incompetent investigator, the smear attacks on Ramos and Compean, how can one come to the conclusion that this was anything other than an unethical and malicious prosecution?
Easy. Just ignore the facts and become a Sutton mouthpiece.
You know that part where two athletes are trash-talking each other, and one points at the scoreboard? This is one of those times.
This case has moved past Sutton and his office. I understand that the emotional (and easier) reaction is to claim "malicious prosecution," "perjury," "conspiracy," "mopery with intent," or whatnot . . . but the fact of the matter is that Sutton (and his office), to this point, have been vindicated by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The only people that are looking like fools are the ones who tried to turn this case into a political football and lost.