Posted on 09/11/2008 6:31:04 PM PDT by presidio9
More of a speech reader. Too bad he didn’t go into acting
BTW I saw your nic on a bumpersticker in Kalispel Montana last week, was that you?
And what about Boris, the mayor of London...he looks like Gary Buce’s mug shot only more disheveled
Nah, I am in NC. And it isn’t original, I know, but appropriate.
Liberals are just plain nuts.
I get the feeling that more than a few posters on this thread didn’t read the entire article.
I once read an article about two towns within miles of each other - one in Canada and one in the United States. The article painted a revealing picture of the difference in world view. The people in the American town were innovative, entrepreneural, passionate in their beliefs, there was class mobility and they took risks. The Canadians were staid, traditional, orderly, bureaucratic, class conscious and process oriented.
I do love the English and their sense of humor, but their attorneys wear wigs and they are subjects of a Queen. I don’t think they have ever “gotten” their rambunctious American offspring and our passion for freedom.
Within a couple of decades there will no longer be any "white Englishmen" ~ instead, a steady stream of "wannabes" from the Commonwealth nations like Jamaica and India are sweeping in and taking up those white wigs and old club mannerisms without skipping a beat.
“Here’s the real problem with Mr Obama: the jarring gap between his promises of change and his status quo performance.”
In other words, The guy ain’t what he says he is...
This election is a struggle between the followers of American exceptionalism and the supporters of global universalism.
Here’s the real problem with Mr Obama: the jarring gap between his promises of change and his status quo performance.
One point I like to make when some Eurotrash starts talking like that is to say, as soberly and apathetically as possible.
“If we so chose, there wouldn’t be a ‘rest of the world’.”
Shuts them right up.
Gerard Baker: "It's been remarked that the biggest difference between Americans and Europeans is religion: ignorant Americans cling to faith; enlightened Europeans long ago embraced the liberating power of reason. Yet here's an odd thing about this election. Europeans are asking Americans to take a leap of faith, to break the chains of empiricism and embrace the possibility of the imagination.
The fact is that a vote for Mr Obama demands uncritical subservience to the irrational, anti-empirical proposition that the past holds no clues about the future, that promise is wholly detached from experience. The second-greatest story ever told, perhaps."
One slight editorial suggestion: "Europeans are asking Americans to take a leap of faith, to break the chains of empiricism and embrace the possibility of the imagination kookery."
It's a leap of faith [ existentialists grab your Kierkegaard paperbacks], but he and his weird messiah cult are all over place with what this will actually mean in concrete terms. It's never quite clear where the Obama Twilight Zone is leading.
Clash of Civilizations 2008: National Review
The Palin Portfolio: Damage Control or the Clash of Civilizations:
Roger Kimball:"Many people, I suspect, believe that the legacy of multiculturalism and political correctnessthe legacy, in a word, of 1960s radicalismhas inflicted grievous ruin upon this country. One party embraces that ruin as our destiny. John McCain and Sarah Palin reject it as tantamount to moral betrayal. This election really is shaping up as a clash of civilizations. No wonder its skirmishes have been so bitter. They are likely to become even more heated as more and more people awaken to the nature of the choice that confronts us."
Indeed.
It's been remarked that the biggest difference between Americans and Europeans is religion: ignorant Americans cling to faith; enlightened Europeans long ago embraced the liberating power of reason. Yet here's an odd thing about this election. Europeans are asking Americans to take a leap of faith, to break the chains of empiricism and embrace the possibility of the imagination.
The fact is that a vote for Mr Obama demands uncritical subservience to the irrational, anti-empirical proposition that the past holds no clues about the future, that promise is wholly detached from experience. The second-greatest story ever told, perhaps.
Bump for later reading
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.