Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clemenza
No, we didn't. Lautenburg (although well known and recycled) was not the incumbent in 2002.

Anywhere else an incumbent polling at 46% is bad. You may think otherwise, and that's your prerogative.

11 posted on 09/11/2008 5:58:40 PM PDT by impeachedrapist (On Free Republic PBD [political bipolar disorder] rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: impeachedrapist

I seem to remember (living across the water in Brooklyn at the time) that Torricelli was down in the polls by about 4 points (and falling) before he dropped out and SCONJ ruled his replacement by Frankenstein to be constitutional. Of course, the braindead voters in places like Woodbridge (the Rio Linda of New Jersey) saw Louse’s name and voted for him because they thought he WAS the incumbent.


13 posted on 09/11/2008 6:02:16 PM PDT by Clemenza (Barack Obama: Black and White and RED all Over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: impeachedrapist
Anywhere else an incumbent polling at 46% is bad.

That's the problem, it's not anywhere else, it's here in NJ.

Zimmer is a liberal republican running against a liberal dem. In that scenerio the dem always wins.

17 posted on 09/11/2008 6:19:25 PM PDT by free me (9/11 Never Forget. May the Lord bless the soul of all those lost that day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson