Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama only talks good game on gender pay equity
ScrippsNews ^ | 09/11/2008 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 09/11/2008 2:31:43 PM PDT by Delacon

"Now is the time to keep the promise of equal pay for an equal day's work," Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama said August 28 in his convention acceptance speech. He told the crowd in Denver: "I want my daughters to have exactly the same opportunities as your sons."

Obama's campaign website is even more specific. Under the heading "Fighting for Pay Equity," the women's issues page laments that, "Despite decades of progress, women still make only 77 cents for every dollar a man makes. A recent study estimates it will take another 47 years for women to close the wage gap with men at Fortune 500 corporate offices. Barack Obama believes the government needs to take steps to better enforce the Equal Pay Act..."

Obama's commitment to federally mandated pay equity stretches from the Rockies to Wall Street and beyond. And yet it seems to have eluded his United States Senate office. Compensation figures for his legislative staff reveal that Obama pays women just 83 cents for every dollar his men make.

A watchdog group called LegiStorm posts online the salaries for Capitol Hill staffers. "We have no political affiliations and no political purpose except to make the workings of Congress as transparent as possible," its website explains. Parsing LegiStorm's official data, gleaned from the Secretary of the Senate, offers a fascinating glimpse at pay equity in the World's Greatest Deliberative Body.

The most recent statistics are for the half-year from October 1, 2007 to March 31, 2008, excluding interns and focusing on full-time personnel. For someone who worked only until, say, last February 29, extrapolating up to six months' service simplifies this analysis. Doubling these half-year figures illustrates how a year's worth of Senate employees' paychecks should look.

Based on these calculations, Obama's 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama's average male employee earned $54,397.

Obama's 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.

Why this disparity? One reason may be the under-representation of women in Obama's highest-compensated ranks. Among Obama's five best-paid advisors, only one was a woman. Among his top 20, seven were women.

Again, on average, Obama's female staffers earn just 83 cents for every dollar his male staffers make. This figure certainly exceeds the 77-cent threshold that Obama's campaign website condemns. However, 83 cents do not equal $1.00. In spite of this 17-cent gap between Obama's rhetoric and reality, he chose to chide GOP presidential contender John McCain on this issue.

Obama responded August 31 to Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's Republican vice-presidential nomination. Palin "seems like a very engaging person," Obama told voters in Toledo, Ohio. "But I've got to say, she's opposed -- like John McCain is -- to equal pay for equal work. That doesn't make much sense to me."

Obama's criticism notwithstanding, McCain's payment patterns are the stuff of feminist dreams.

McCain's 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878.

On average, according to these data, women in John McCain's office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal, a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart -- while adding $10,726 to her annual income -- by leaving Barack Obama's office and going to work for John McCain.

How could this be?

One explanation could be that women compose a majority of McCain's highest-paid aides. Among his top-five best-compensated staffers, three are women. Of his 20-highest-salaried employees, 13 are women. The Republican presidential nominee relies on women -- much more than men -- for advice at the highest, and thus, best-paid levels.

If anyone on McCain's Senate staff is unhappy, McCain's male staffers might complain that they seem to get a slightly raw deal.

In short, these statistics suggest that John McCain is more than fair with his female employees, while Barack Obama -- at the expense of the women who work for him -- quietly perpetuates the very same pay-equity divide that he loudly denounces. Of all people, the Democratic standard bearer should understand that equal pay begins at home.

(Deroy Murdock is a columnist with Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University. E-mail him at deroy.Murdock(at)gmail.com)



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: casaloma; election; mccain; mccainpalin; obama; obamabiden; obamatruthfile; palin
Obama's 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama's average male employee earned $54,397.

Obama's 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.

Why this disparity?

(snip)

McCain's payment patterns are the stuff of feminist dreams.

McCain's 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878.

On average, according to these data, women in John McCain's office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal, a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart -- while adding $10,726 to her annual income -- by leaving Barack Obama's office and going to work for John McCain.

How could this be?


1 posted on 09/11/2008 2:31:43 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

ping


2 posted on 09/11/2008 2:33:17 PM PDT by Delacon (Vote Biden for VP, Delaware needs a break)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

If it wasn’t for double standards, democrats wouldn’t have any.


3 posted on 09/11/2008 2:36:43 PM PDT by stockstrader (CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN--a ticket with 2 northern liberal lawyer career bureaucrats/s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Can sombody feed this to the PUMA websites?


4 posted on 09/11/2008 2:36:56 PM PDT by Brookhaven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

I see a great 527 ad coming out of this. Maybe the RNC could get away with it, but not the McCain campaign itself.

A nice ad showing:

- Obama claiming McCain/Palin don’t care about women,
- then showing a bunch of Obama’s sexist comments (”hold on, sweetie”, “throwing the china”, “lipstick on a pig”, etc),
- and finally put up the pay figures for women in their offices.


5 posted on 09/11/2008 2:37:45 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
That's all he ever does: talk! Photobucket
6 posted on 09/11/2008 2:41:15 PM PDT by xuberalles (The Best Anti-Liberal Novelties On The Net! http://www.cafepress.com/titillatingtees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

“Can sombody feed this to the PUMA websites?”

Heck, someone should forward the article to all Obama’s female staffers.


7 posted on 09/11/2008 2:42:15 PM PDT by Delacon ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

And remember, this is in one legislative office under one general work classification.

This is no comparison of steel workers and kindergarten teachers.


8 posted on 09/11/2008 2:58:56 PM PDT by afortiori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Next question: Obama 58 staff; McCain 42, so why is Obama’s office so bloated?


9 posted on 09/11/2008 3:00:12 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

This is like shooting fish in a barrel anymore.


10 posted on 09/11/2008 3:07:04 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

When Democrats lament pay equity, are they actually proposing comparable worth? They were big on this a few years ago. eg female dominated jobs (receptionists) should earn the same as male dominated jobs (garbage men) and should be regulated at the federal level.
I ask this because on the talk shows, the Dim talking heads always say the GOP is against pay equity.


11 posted on 09/11/2008 3:10:21 PM PDT by Don@VB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don@VB
are they actually proposing comparable worth?

BO certainly seems to mean that.

[Excerpt] "Equal worth" would spawn immense opportunities for trial lawyers, who have contributed millions to the Democratic 2008 campaigns, as well as past Democratic elections.

Mr. Obama, embracing the misleading metric that women make only 77 cents for every dollar paid to men, cosponsored two Senate bills in 2007, neither of which has come to a floor vote.

The pending Fair Pay Act of 2007 calls for equal pay for "equivalent" jobs. The Fair Pay Restoration Act, better known as the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which passed the House in July 2007, would give plaintiffs in pay-discrimination disputes virtually no deadline to sue.

Obama and Inequality: On Women in the Workforce

12 posted on 09/11/2008 3:42:49 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Great Obamanation of Desolation, attempting to sit in the Oval Office, where he ought not..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Don@VB
"When Democrats lament pay equity, are they actually proposing comparable worth?"

I believe so, yes. Equal pay for equal work is already mandated by Federal law, I think. "Comparable worth" is about the only frontier that remains for the left.

13 posted on 09/11/2008 4:02:42 PM PDT by Irene Adler (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Similar:

Equal pay for equal work? Busted: McCain, Clinton Pay Women Better than Obama!

14 posted on 09/11/2008 4:13:26 PM PDT by Species8472 (Alaska girls kick ass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
This whole compensation scheme is socialistic..
Evening out compensation is Marxist at its core..

If women and blacks make as much or more then white men then THATS A GOOD THING.. if white men make more THAN THATS BAD..

Only a RINO would buy this flaw concept

15 posted on 09/11/2008 4:40:51 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson