I have asked you a number of times to point out one or more holes in evolution theory.
I have also pointed out that the quote you presented from Coulter is demonstrably wrong. It is simply untrue.
Same with Behe's latest book. He asserts that adaptations that take two or three steps are statistically impossible, and yet several instances have been observed, some in HIV in the last few decades, and some in carefully controlled laboratory experiments.
Some of these instances were in the literature before Behe wrote his book.
I don't know how you reason, but for me it's kind of silly to start with a premise that is known to be untrue.
Why do you want to drag me into scientific discussion? Do you think I’m a scientist?