Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia sends two long-range bombers to Venezuela
wired dispatch ^ | 9/10/08 | wired dispatch

Posted on 09/10/2008 3:18:45 PM PDT by Flavius

Russia has flown two long-range bombers to Venezuela, flexing its military muscle in Washington's traditional backyard as the former Cold War enemies spar over the conflict in Georgia.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Wednesday the Tu-160 strategic bombers were in the South American oil-exporting nation to strengthen military ties and counter U.S. regional influences.


(Excerpt) Read more at wiredispatch.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; latinamerica; russia; venezuela
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Tommyjo
“Not thinking are you? The support comes from IL-76/78s deployed as part of the support fleet. Doesn’t take much to deploy a small support team and spares on those transports/tankers.”

Well Tommyjo, I must say that was not a very nice thing to say - that I am not thinking. Kinda hurts my feelings actually. But, back to the task at hand; if we let history be our guide on this we will see that the Soviets and now Russians have never been very good at projecting power. Their venture in Afghanistan is a good example. Logistics and supply chain support for our combat units is a uniquely American attribute that no other country has been able to even come close to - going all the way back to WWII.

41 posted on 09/11/2008 4:00:51 PM PDT by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear
Well think then how much support the deployment of two bombers requires? They are not deploying the entire strategic bomber force. During the 1990s the Russians deployed two Tu-95MS Bear Hs to the US on a goodwill visit. The support team was flown in on the IL-78 tanker. It is not exactly rocket science to support such a small deployment.

Images of the two Tu-160s in Venezuela.

If U.S. logistics were that perfect then they wouldn't have had to contract out to Russian and Ukranian firms for the use of heavy lift Antonov 124s and the sole Antonov 225 on defense contracts. The U.S. military currently requires more heavy lift capability than it currently has.

Copy and past link

http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/jan/05/air_force_hires_russian_jets26735/

42 posted on 09/11/2008 4:23:55 PM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo

“The U.S. military currently requires more heavy lift capability than it currently has.”

Well, lift capability is one of those things that there can never be enough of. But, in comparing to Russia, the comparison is not even close. Additionally, we (the U.S. - assuming you are part of this “we”) have a huge commercial fleet that can be tapped at any time needed. Yes, we utillized some of our commercial fleet during both wars but not to any great extent.


43 posted on 09/12/2008 4:44:23 AM PDT by snoringbear (Government is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson