Posted on 09/10/2008 3:18:45 PM PDT by Flavius
Well Tommyjo, I must say that was not a very nice thing to say - that I am not thinking. Kinda hurts my feelings actually. But, back to the task at hand; if we let history be our guide on this we will see that the Soviets and now Russians have never been very good at projecting power. Their venture in Afghanistan is a good example. Logistics and supply chain support for our combat units is a uniquely American attribute that no other country has been able to even come close to - going all the way back to WWII.
Images of the two Tu-160s in Venezuela.
If U.S. logistics were that perfect then they wouldn't have had to contract out to Russian and Ukranian firms for the use of heavy lift Antonov 124s and the sole Antonov 225 on defense contracts. The U.S. military currently requires more heavy lift capability than it currently has.
Copy and past link
http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/jan/05/air_force_hires_russian_jets26735/
“The U.S. military currently requires more heavy lift capability than it currently has.”
Well, lift capability is one of those things that there can never be enough of. But, in comparing to Russia, the comparison is not even close. Additionally, we (the U.S. - assuming you are part of this “we”) have a huge commercial fleet that can be tapped at any time needed. Yes, we utillized some of our commercial fleet during both wars but not to any great extent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.