Put away the baseball bats, read the article.
1 posted on
09/10/2008 10:10:58 AM PDT by
IrishMike
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: IrishMike
Handouts just keep people from getting jobs and taking care of themselves. Government handouts don’t work. There are generations of families that have never worked.
28 posted on
09/10/2008 11:31:28 AM PDT by
nclaurel
(I think therefore I vote Republican.)
To: traviskicks; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed freepmail me or post a message here.
29 posted on
09/10/2008 12:04:30 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: IrishMike
Thats right, we transfer to the low-income population an amount equal to the entire income of middle-income households, that is, households in the middle fifth (40th to 60th percentile) of the American income distribution. You can be wealthy and low-income at the same time, and you can also be be poor and high-income at the same time.
To: IrishMike
Yeah but look at how much the poverty rate has gone down in the last 40 years. < /sarc>
34 posted on
09/10/2008 12:14:44 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: IrishMike
I’ve been as poor as any person in this country but my home was never trashy or dirty. I didn’t have the means to go to expensive schools but I am hardly uneducated. I have few material goods but not one thing I do have was dishonestly obtained. I learned from others that not running afoul of the law saves a lot of money.
So by some definitions I am and have been poor all my life but I’ve never considered myself impoverished.
I’m sure most of the posters and readers know the difference.
Have I ever received any sort of government assistance? Sure, I’ve used programs that my tax dollars had supported but the key word is here is assistance not a livlihood, not living on others work when I could care for my own needs.
Assistance as a last resort and as a very temporary event, not as a means of avoiding the burdens and rewards of providing for myself.
Money has never reduced the poverty of character, spirit if you will, hence it cannot reduce the number of members of society who are poor due to their poverty.
35 posted on
09/10/2008 12:42:33 PM PDT by
count-your-change
(you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: IrishMike
A trillion dollars in the hands of small businesses would have created millions of jobs and done more for the war on poverty than all welfare programs put together. A more logical approach would have been to create tax free zones in areas of high poverty.
37 posted on
09/10/2008 1:16:25 PM PDT by
yazoo
To: IrishMike
OK for those of us that would eliminate welfare programs, but the article has zero cited sources.
An argument of possible merit, depending on the numbers.
To: IrishMike
41 posted on
09/10/2008 4:04:38 PM PDT by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson