Posted on 09/10/2008 8:30:10 AM PDT by LibFreeUSA
Obama has class.
Don't misinterpret his 'lipstick' comments. Just check out below - taken from Pajamas Media poster: Vitaboy<
================
For anyone who doubts whether Obamas lipstick comments were innocent or not, I would highly suggest him or her to look at the following videos of him giving speeches.
The SAME gesture at the SAME point in his speech, eliciting the SAME raucous reaction from two different audiences.
If Obama is capable beyond reasonable doubt of flipping the bird to Hillary Clinton - a Democrat, no less - in public, then I think its pretty clear what he meant by lipstick on a pig.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoOFp-RDpvM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhkq11UExcw
The guy is juvenile, easily rattled, and thin-skinned - definitely not presidential material. He is a sexist, all right, and the worst kind - the passive-aggressive type that always seems to get away with his antics because he hides behind veiled references.
Finally! Someone got the right concept down.
Thanks!
It makes it more likely that the lipstick on a pig remark was a deliberate uncouth reference to Gov. Palin.
It had to be done, lol. Now off to do something a little more productive.
Hearing a lot more about his ‘speech’ yesterday.
He revelled in his audience booing Sarah.
He got a kick out of them shouting...NO PIT BULLS
Remember how classy the RNC audience was when Sarah mentioned Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton?
The slime-master just egged the audience on with his lipstick on a pig comments.
His body language speaks louder than his words!
Nice tagline idea!
Unbelievable
I played them side by side... same speech, from two different angles.
“Fish” is a dirisive term that Gay Men use towards women to show their snide dismissal of them. Much the way that Barack has no White or any women it seems on his staff.
You're right on. He's the kind of guy who likes to "rough up" and hit women - only this one will hit back and kick his a$$!!
Between those two view, you are right. There are no common people in the background. But I was looking at thing from about five different angles this morning (after tx_eggman told me of my error), and between those views you could stitch together the entire crowd. There was really no doubt about it.
A male muslim making reference to a Christian woman as a “pig” and stinky? I think we are witnessing a candidate in full meltdown mode and having a hissy fit. Unfit to lead? How about just plain unfit and paranoid-delusional. Let’s all pray he doesn’t totally flip out and pull an O.J.
Racist and sexist.
Amazingly good catch - thanks!
It is definitely the same speech from different angles. When the two videos are synced up, the hand gestures and verbal stumbles are identical.
The people behind him are in very different areas of the risers. On the first video you can see the far right side of the backdrop while on the second, the far left side is visible.
However, the video shows that Obama makes the same sort of verbal stumble right before giving Hillary the finger that he does before making the lipstick on a pig remark.
Also, the “lipstick” and”old fish” references were just too close to Palin and McCain to be a mistake.
He was probably trying to match Palin’s “folksy” speech last week, but he got personal in a way she did not, mocking physical traits.
Now he’s denying it.
It’s his macaca moment, for sure.
Obama isn’t that good heheh
but what’s worse is that right after the ‘finger’ he does a Wright style ‘dig’ motion
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.