[TexasCajun]

As I posted before:

Websters: Elitist Doofusitis

[metmom]

All she has to do is read the legislation. It’s not about teaching kids to recognize sexual predators and keeping them safe from them.

[ModelBreaker]

Can anyone access the language of the bill?

[Maelstorm]

One thing that gets me is the obscene interest that liberal teachers and politicians have with encouraging the sex lives of prepubescent children. It is disgusting. Let the parents take care of that.

[Da Coyote]

Nice try WaPo. Wanna put a recorder in one of these classes and see what’s really said? Betcha don’t - or won’t. Wonder why.

Gads, you libs are so easy to read...even more so with journalist libs (a redundancy, to be sure). Simple minds, simple (and faulty) arguments.

[Tax-chick]

There’s no such thing as “age-appropriate sex education” for pre-pubescent children, and anything SIECUS is involved in is filth, guaranteed.

McCain’s right.

[Melinda]

It is with Obama’s belief and blessing that the State MUST take over the parental responsibility of teaching a child sensitive subjects. It assumes parents are not capable of protecting their children. BUG OFF, OBAMA, and keep away from my kids!!

[Melinda]

It is with Obama’s belief and blessing that the State MUST take over the parental responsibility of teaching a child sensitive subjects. It assumes parents are not capable of protecting their children. BUG OFF, OBAMA, and keep away from my kids!!

[poobear]

“You can teach a kid about what's appropriate and not appropriate to protect them from predators out there.”

BS! You don't have to teach a child under the age of 6 what these perverts will do to them or what's ‘inappropriate behavior’.

“Stranger Danger” works just fine!

[edpc]

Obama spokesman Bill Burton tells First Read: "You can teach a kid about what's appropriate and not appropriate to protect them from predators out there." In addition, he issued a document showing that the Oregon Department of Education has guidelines for sex education for children in grades K-3 (which includes understanding the difference between a good touch and a bad touch), and that the Sexuality Information And Education Council

Perhaps Obama, at tomorrow's luncheon, is going to discuss the bold portion above with Bill Clinton.

[Noumenon]

First of all, teaching little kids about sexual predators is the job of parents, not the State.

Second, ‘teaching about predators’ isn’t exactly what’s being taught, is it?

How about a look at the curriculum and teaching guides?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

[50sDad]

When I was a child, I was taught it was a Bad Thing to get into a car with someone you didn’t know, not to take candy from strangers, and not to talk to someone you didn’t know while alone. I didn’t get detailed diagrams or specific descriptions of Why It Would Be Bad to shatter what innocence I had, and fortunately I never had any problem.

[RC2]

What Obama is trying to do is the same as what Hillary wanted. Take the childhood away from children and indoctrinate them into their way of thinking earlier in life. Let our children be children. The communist way is to infiltrate our schools as soon as possible. Get the children indoctrinated when they are 3-4 years old.

[Numbers Guy]

Dionne is always amusing because he has this persona of being a reasonable, mild-mannered guy on TV. Then you read his columns and he’s always ranting about the evils of anyone to the right of Ted Kennedy.

[Atlas Sneezed]

Teaching kids not to take candy from strangers, or to let anyone touch them where there underwear covers isn’t “sex education.”

[Neoliberalnot]

McCain has repeatedly stated he is against allowing homosexuals to adopt children.

[Girlene]

Have you seen this new ad by McCain? Education - I like it.