Skip to comments.
WaPo: 'Is McCain Against Teaching Little Kids to Beware of Sexual Predators?'
NewsBusters ^
| 09/10/08
| Mike Bates
Posted on 09/10/2008 8:08:17 AM PDT by Mike Bates
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Mike Bates
As I posted before:
Websters: Elitist Doofusitis
To: Mike Bates
All she has to do is read the legislation. It’s not about teaching kids to recognize sexual predators and keeping them safe from them.
3
posted on
09/10/2008 8:12:11 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: Mike Bates
Can anyone access the language of the bill?
To: Mike Bates
One thing that gets me is the obscene interest that liberal teachers and politicians have with encouraging the sex lives of prepubescent children. It is disgusting. Let the parents take care of that.
5
posted on
09/10/2008 8:12:35 AM PDT
by
Maelstorm
(This country was not founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a government check!")
To: Mike Bates
Nice try WaPo. Wanna put a recorder in one of these classes and see what’s really said? Betcha don’t - or won’t. Wonder why.
Gads, you libs are so easy to read...even more so with journalist libs (a redundancy, to be sure). Simple minds, simple (and faulty) arguments.
6
posted on
09/10/2008 8:14:07 AM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: Mike Bates
There’s no such thing as “age-appropriate sex education” for pre-pubescent children, and anything SIECUS is involved in is filth, guaranteed.
McCain’s right.
7
posted on
09/10/2008 8:14:42 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("McCain and Palin: The Normal People Revolution" ~ rrrod)
To: Mike Bates
It is with Obama’s belief and blessing that the State MUST take over the parental responsibility of teaching a child sensitive subjects. It assumes parents are not capable of protecting their children. BUG OFF, OBAMA, and keep away from my kids!!
8
posted on
09/10/2008 8:16:25 AM PDT
by
Melinda
To: Mike Bates
It is with Obama’s belief and blessing that the State MUST take over the parental responsibility of teaching a child sensitive subjects. It assumes parents are not capable of protecting their children. BUG OFF, OBAMA, and keep away from my kids!!
9
posted on
09/10/2008 8:16:47 AM PDT
by
Melinda
To: ModelBreaker
The link is on the NB piece. It's
SB0099.
10
posted on
09/10/2008 8:17:00 AM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: Mike Bates
LGBT advocates can go into Public Schools and talk to six year olds about sex of all kinds and do not have to undergo a CORI check. But my Kiwanis club dioes because we run a RIF program. Go figure.
11
posted on
09/10/2008 8:21:21 AM PDT
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Mike Bates
“You can teach a kid about what's appropriate and not appropriate to protect them from predators out there.”
BS! You don't have to teach a child under the age of 6 what these perverts will do to them or what's ‘inappropriate behavior’.
“Stranger Danger” works just fine!
12
posted on
09/10/2008 8:21:53 AM PDT
by
poobear
(“…individual salvation depends on collective salvation." Barack Hussein Obama Wesleyan University)
To: TexasCajun
He looks a little like the people he is talking about....
13
posted on
09/10/2008 8:22:01 AM PDT
by
Born In America
(Affirmative action is no way to elect a President, now or ever....)
To: Mike Bates
Obama spokesman Bill Burton tells First Read: "You can teach a kid about what's appropriate and not appropriate to protect them from predators out there." In addition, he issued a document showing that the Oregon Department of Education has guidelines for sex education for children in grades K-3 (which includes understanding the difference between a good touch and a bad touch), and that the Sexuality Information And Education Council Perhaps Obama, at tomorrow's luncheon, is going to discuss the bold portion above with Bill Clinton.
14
posted on
09/10/2008 8:22:48 AM PDT
by
edpc
(Head On!!! Apply directly to Begala)
To: Mike Bates
First of all, teaching little kids about sexual predators is the job of parents, not the State.
Second, ‘teaching about predators’ isn’t exactly what’s being taught, is it?
How about a look at the curriculum and teaching guides?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?
15
posted on
09/10/2008 8:27:46 AM PDT
by
Noumenon
(Time for Atlas to shrug - and to pick up a gun)
To: Mike Bates
When I was a child, I was taught it was a Bad Thing to get into a car with someone you didn’t know, not to take candy from strangers, and not to talk to someone you didn’t know while alone. I didn’t get detailed diagrams or specific descriptions of Why It Would Be Bad to shatter what innocence I had, and fortunately I never had any problem.
16
posted on
09/10/2008 8:28:08 AM PDT
by
50sDad
(OBAMA: In your heart you know he's Wright.)
To: edpc
Perhaps Obama, at tomorrow's luncheon, is going to discuss the bold portion above with Bill Clinton. If Bill can keep his mitts off the waitress long enough. .. .
17
posted on
09/10/2008 8:28:38 AM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: Mike Bates
What Obama is trying to do is the same as what Hillary wanted. Take the childhood away from children and indoctrinate them into their way of thinking earlier in life. Let our children be children. The communist way is to infiltrate our schools as soon as possible. Get the children indoctrinated when they are 3-4 years old.
18
posted on
09/10/2008 8:29:41 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: Mike Bates
Dionne is always amusing because he has this persona of being a reasonable, mild-mannered guy on TV. Then you read his columns and he’s always ranting about the evils of anyone to the right of Ted Kennedy.
To: Numbers Guy
Dionne is always amusing because he has this persona of being a reasonable, mild-mannered guy on TV. Maybe he took lessons at the Dick Durbin School of Hiding Your Radicalism.
20
posted on
09/10/2008 8:33:06 AM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson