Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen 9/10/08: 48-47 Obama with leaners (46-46 w/o leaners)
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll ^

Posted on 09/10/2008 6:58:09 AM PDT by CatOwner

This results matches the WSJ poll released yesterday showing Obama up 47-46 with leaners. I am starting to think that the Gallup results (+5 RV, +10 LV) are outliers.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; mccainpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: InterceptPoint

I haven’t seen the internals, so I honestly can’t speculate.


41 posted on 09/10/2008 7:41:06 AM PDT by impeachedrapist (On Free Republic PBD [political bipolar disorder] rules!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

that was just a matter of timing to be doing a poll at the time the story broke.

zogby is no longer credible with his number’s tweak.


42 posted on 09/10/2008 7:44:09 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: libscum
Hey Rasmussen, if Mccain is winning the majority of white women, indys and white males just tell how the hell is this thing stil TIED? He needs to look at his sampling techniques.

Maybe Rasmussen has decided to model Democrat voter fraud in this year's election.

I hate the fact that in many cases these polls are constructed to give a biased viewpoint, trying to keep the race close for whatever reason (media want Obama and hates GOP, Rasmussen/Zogby want viewership to remain high during the election).

43 posted on 09/10/2008 7:44:36 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

How about Cynthia McKinney and the Green Party? /s


44 posted on 09/10/2008 7:47:29 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

> VA and especially CO have me concerned, and I think this is where the election is won or lost <

I don’t see the Dhimm’s taking VA. At most, they may improve on Kerry’s 2004 performance by a point or so.

Let’s remember that Jim Webb won VA in 2006 by a mere 5000-vote margin. I believe that slim victory was made possible only by his support among four groups that would otherwise have voted for George Allen:

1. Coal miners and other mountaineers of SW Virginia, to whom Webb appealed as a fellow Scots-Irish descendant. Given Obama’s “anti-coal” remarks, however, and given that Hillary carried this area easily, it’s hard to see how Obama does well in the Virginia mountains.

2. Vietnamese refugees in northern Virginia, who were wooed non-stop by Webb’s Vietnamese wife. But Obama and his wife have zero appeal to this group — maybe less than zero!

3. Asian Indians (Hindus) all over the Old Dominion, who were offended by Allen’s “maccaca” reference. Some of them might look favorably on Obama as a fellow man of color. But then McCain has an adopted daughter — with very dark skin — from Bangladesh. And it’s hard to see much Hindu enthusiasm for a man whose father was a Muslim. Advantage McCain.

4. Navy and Marine Corps active duty personnel and vets, plus their families, in the Hampton Roads area. A signficant percentage of them voted for Webb due almost entirely to his Marine Corps record. They’ll also swing heavily to McCain, likewise for his Navy service.

So Obama may as well stop buying ads and paying staff in VA. Otherwise, it will be money down the drain.


45 posted on 09/10/2008 7:48:43 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: what_not2007
What poll is more trusting?

The poll the people take in NOV on Election Day!

None of the thousands of polls taken by the dozens of pollsters before then matter and are to be taken with a grain of salt!

46 posted on 09/10/2008 7:49:14 AM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

How can 20% of the women shift to McCain and it result in Obama +1? Aren’t we half the population and more than half of the voting population? (Women typically vote a little more than guys do.)

Before the Rep. convention it was 48-43 Obama. (If I’m reading the chart right.) That’s a five point difference. If 20% of the women shifted and NO men, we should see McCain up by 5% now. I’d also add that we now have more conservatives in the “Likely Voter” category than two weeks ago. Palin will get us off the couch on election night like McCain never could.

I think Rasmussen is off somehow, but I’m willing to wait for next week’s polls before I finalize that impression.

We also need to wait a week to see the impact of the lipstick comment. If it’s anything like Kerry’s “bunny suit”, he’ll never regain his momentum.


47 posted on 09/10/2008 7:49:46 AM PDT by Marie (Palin/McCain in '08...................... and free laz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beagleone

He is, but not because of bias. Rassmussen uses a 90-day rolling average of party affiliations to balance his sample. In the current sample that meant an extra 7.9% of the sample were D’s compared to R’s. His own current data says that the registration advantage is now 5.7%.

If any FReepers are Premium Members of the Rassumssen site, they can probably get the breakdown of the polls by party affilitation and recompute the result weighting the parties by current affiliation numbers instead of the rolling average. I suspect the calculation would show McCain/Palin up a few points.


48 posted on 09/10/2008 7:52:20 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (For real change stop electing lawyers: Fighter-Pilot/Hockey-Mom '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: libscum

private polling vs public polling

remember FNC’s Morris said only 7% of men were undecided while 40% of women were undecided.
pre-palin.

I suspect Obama’s panic is related to the non-public polling.


49 posted on 09/10/2008 7:55:17 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: bushsupporter30

I have never ... including Reagan ... seen Repubs so enthusiastic and committed.

(Just another anecdotal, but still ....)


50 posted on 09/10/2008 7:55:24 AM PDT by Eleutherios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KeatsforFirstDog

I redid Rasmussen’s numbers using Ras’ party affiliation percentages from Oct. 2004, immediately preceding the 2004 election. Basing off the “without leaners” number of 46-46, I get McCain 52, Obama 48.


51 posted on 09/10/2008 7:58:33 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
Who are you trying to FOOL, Your PRAYING the Gallup results are an outlier. I have read you previous posts . Obama cheerleader.
52 posted on 09/10/2008 7:59:11 AM PDT by ncalburt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what_not2007

McCain needs to find something to take the wind out of the “young people’s” sails. They usually don’t vote, but this time, I’m worried that they will vote in large numbers, if they feel they can make a difference.


53 posted on 09/10/2008 8:00:44 AM PDT by rivercat (Sarah Palin '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner
While I would like nothing more than to see a McCain landslide, the reality is that it is very unlikely to happen. Too many people have accepted the Dark Side.

This is going to be another extremely close election. I like our chances, but it could definitely go either way.

54 posted on 09/10/2008 8:02:31 AM PDT by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Honestly, I would like to ask Rasmussen if the majority of indys, white men and white women now favor Mccain just how is he projecting a tie? Is he including the dead people and college students voting 4x in Dade County, Columbus Ohio, Saint Louis , Detroit, Philly, Pitt, and Richmond?


55 posted on 09/10/2008 8:04:31 AM PDT by libscum (don't sit out- vote Mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet

What were the differences in the Party affiliations in 2004 comapred to 2008 ?


56 posted on 09/10/2008 8:06:35 AM PDT by libscum (don't sit out- vote Mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rivercat

“McCain needs to find something to take the wind out of the “young people’s” sails. They usually don’t vote, but this time, I’m worried that they will vote in large numbers, if they feel they can make a difference.”

Well, let’s start the rumor that smoking kudzu will get you high and we’ll solve two problems (1) we won’t have a kudzu problem, and (2) the youngun’s will be ill from smoking rot gut and won’t make it to the polls.


57 posted on 09/10/2008 8:08:55 AM PDT by hoe_cake ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." MTwain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LadyNavyVet
I redid Rasmussen’s numbers using Ras’ party affiliation percentages from Oct. 2004, immediately preceding the 2004 election. Basing off the “without leaners” number of 46-46, I get McCain 52, Obama 48.

That's consistent with my SWAG (Scientific Wild A** Guess) estimate, too. McCain/Palin is in no worse shape and probably somewhat better shape than Bush/Cheney was at this time in 2004. There may be some "Bradley Effect" and "Palin Effect", too, but we won't see that until the polls close. I'd be ecstatic with 54-46.

58 posted on 09/10/2008 8:09:09 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt
Actually, you have that backwards. I pray that the Gallup results are closer to reality and that Rasmussen, WSJ, etc. are being incorrectly biased toward Obama.

Check the history. I voted for GWB for president in 2000 and 2004. Do you REALLY think I want Obama to win this election? Thanks for playing anyway.

59 posted on 09/10/2008 8:09:19 AM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

Yes... CO is a key unless McCain can pick up one elsewhere.

He needs FL, OH, IN. I think he’ll get that appalachian belt...I’m hoping Penn.


60 posted on 09/10/2008 8:10:03 AM PDT by nikos1121 (Mr. Smith is coming back to Washington in the name of Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson