Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KeatsforFirstDog

I redid Rasmussen’s numbers using Ras’ party affiliation percentages from Oct. 2004, immediately preceding the 2004 election. Basing off the “without leaners” number of 46-46, I get McCain 52, Obama 48.


51 posted on 09/10/2008 7:58:33 AM PDT by LadyNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: LadyNavyVet

What were the differences in the Party affiliations in 2004 comapred to 2008 ?


56 posted on 09/10/2008 8:06:35 AM PDT by libscum (don't sit out- vote Mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: LadyNavyVet
I redid Rasmussen’s numbers using Ras’ party affiliation percentages from Oct. 2004, immediately preceding the 2004 election. Basing off the “without leaners” number of 46-46, I get McCain 52, Obama 48.

That's consistent with my SWAG (Scientific Wild A** Guess) estimate, too. McCain/Palin is in no worse shape and probably somewhat better shape than Bush/Cheney was at this time in 2004. There may be some "Bradley Effect" and "Palin Effect", too, but we won't see that until the polls close. I'd be ecstatic with 54-46.

58 posted on 09/10/2008 8:09:09 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson