Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

new national enquirer smears
Nat. Enquirer ^ | 09/10/08 | National Enquirer

Posted on 09/09/2008 11:55:16 PM PDT by machogirl

PALIN FAMILY SHOCKERS: WHAT SARAH'S REALLY HIDING!

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/_palin_family_shockers_what_sarahs_really_hiding/celebrity/65407


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: alteredtitle; mccainpalin; nationalenquirer; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disguting, I did not want to print the garbage that they said. Must go to link.
1 posted on 09/09/2008 11:55:17 PM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: machogirl

There is no low that these “journalists” will not sink to.

I guess Obama’s declaration of leave family alone, (wink wink) didn’t work.


2 posted on 09/09/2008 11:58:11 PM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

Owned by Hillary syncophants.

No worries...

Must NOT go to link.


3 posted on 09/09/2008 11:58:23 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Sarah'cuda Rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

"That's lightweight stuff, Track. Let me show you what I got."

4 posted on 09/09/2008 11:58:30 PM PDT by jddqr (White queen checkmates black king: http://palincheckmate.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

Enquirer never flinches from self-parody.


5 posted on 09/09/2008 11:59:35 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

Thankfully, the kind of people that read the National Enquirer is are not they kind of people that would vote Republican.


6 posted on 09/10/2008 12:00:14 AM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

They get one story right and now think they are reliable media?

Disgusting doesn’t even begin to meet my ire over this continual bashing of a woman’s family.

SInce they have been ruled a magazine and not the “press” in prior lawsuits, they should be forced to reveal their “anonymous sources,” in my non attorney opinion.


7 posted on 09/10/2008 12:00:23 AM PDT by DakotaRed (Don't you wish you had supported a conservative when you had the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: DakotaRed

i agree, let’s hear who is spreading the slime.

This is an example where the press’ “first amendment” (anonymous, never have to reveal sources) rights are the downside. There may not even be “anonymous sources”.

They can make it up and can’t be challenged to reveal.

Wonder where the Obama-Ayers-etc. connections are going to be displayed in the Enquirer.


9 posted on 09/10/2008 12:03:39 AM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TINS

I think that it will just bring her more support. I agree, the Enquirer readers would vote for obambi anyway.

I think that it is vile to bring the children into this.
JUst vile.


10 posted on 09/10/2008 12:06:11 AM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Even if all this is true, I don’t care. it is not b business and either was Al Gore’s son’s DUI or Chelsea getting her degree without actually going to school hardly at all or the Bush girls partying. I don’t care and either does anyone else with a brain.


11 posted on 09/10/2008 12:08:52 AM PDT by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TINS

2. MORAL: Persons entering the United States Army should be of good moral character. The underlying purpose of moral character enlistment standards is to minimize entrance of persons who are likely to become disciplinary cases or security risks, or who would disrupt good order, morale, and discipline. It is the responsibility of the Recruiter to ensure that every applicant for enlistment or appointment does not have disqualifying law violations. You are considered to have law violations if you have ever been arrested, charged, cited, or held, or detained in any way by any law enforcement agency (to include, Juvenile Authorities, Police Officers, Sheriff, Department of Natural Resources, Fish and Game Wardens, Military Police, etc.) regardless of disposition (whether the case resulted in no charges filed, fine, probation, dismissal, or other disposition. This includes traffic tickets.

For the purpose of determining qualifications, the following is taken into account:

a. Whether or not you were convicted or placed under other adverse disposition for the charge. Other adverse disposition is defined as deferred judgement, judgement set aside, probation before judgement, etc. Basically, if you have to do, say, or pay anything to anyone by order of a judge or magistrate, then you are considered to have a conviction.

b. The number of total charges, regardless of disposition. Applicants who have a significant criminal history, but because of dismissed charges, plea bargains, negotiated settlements, or release without prosecution, and do not meet the waiver thresholds below, must have their enlistment applications reviewed before enlistment.

NOTE: This is one of the major reasons for disqualification for enlistment or appointment in the United States Army. Any specific questions should be directed to a United States Army Recruiter. The following are the basic waiver thresholds.

a. If you have a GED, have a Home School Diploma, or a graduate of the National Guard Youth Challenge program, then you will require a waiver (special permission) if you have:

1) only 1 misdemeanor offense

2) Received a civil court conviction or other adverse dispositions for six or more minor traffic offenses where the fine was $250 or more per offense. (requires a waiver for enlistment)

3) Received four or more civil convictions or other adverse dispositions for minor non-traffic offenses. (requires a waiver for enlistment)

b. If you are still in High School, are a High School Graduate, or have a GED AND 15 credit hours of college, then you will require a waiver (special permission) if you have:

1) Received a civil court conviction or other adverse dispositions for six or more minor traffic offenses where the fine was $250 or more per offense.

2) Received four or more civil convictions or other adverse dispositions for minor non-traffic offenses.

3) Received 2, 3, 4 or 5 civil convictions or other adverse dispositions for a misdemeanor offense.

4) Received a total of five civil convictions or other adverse dispositions for a combination of minor non-traffic and misdemeanor (1 misdemeanor and 4 minor non traffic).

5) Received 1 conviction or adverse disposition for one of the following listed serious offenses:

(a) Carry of weapon on school ground regardless of disposition when imposed by court or school officials (i.e. expelled, suspended, fined).

(b) Possession of marijuana on school grounds regardless of disposition when imposed by court or school officials (i.e. expelled, suspended, fined).

(c) Domestic battery/violence not covered under Lautenburg Amendment. (ie. Fights between siblings, and other than defined below).

(d) DUI/DWI. Received 1 DUI/DWI must be processed as a serious offense and requires a Bn Cdr’s level waiver. Received two convictions or adverse dispositions for driving while intoxicated, under the influence, or while impaired due to substance abuse, alcohol, drugs, or any other condition that affected judgment or driving ability, the approval authority is HQ, USAREC.

(e) Simple possession of marijuana or drug paraphernalia. (Waiver (BN) may be considered if charged for both on same date and time.) ( 2 charges requires USAREC waiver)

(f) Solicitation for/and/or prostitution.

c. You WILL NOT be allowed to enlist if you are of ANY educational level, and have ANY of the following charges:

1) Intoxicated or under influence of alcohol or drugs at time of application, or at any stage of processing for enlistment.

2) Having history of psychotic disorders or state of insanity at time of application for enlistment.

3) Questionable moral character.

4) Alcoholism.

5) Drug dependence.

6) Sexual perversion.

7) Homosexual Conduct.

8) History of antisocial behavior.

9) History of frequent or chronic venereal disease.

10) Criminal or juvenile court charges filed or pending against them by civil authorities.

11) Persons under civil restraint, such as confinement, parole, or probation, with some LIMITED exceptions
12) Subject of initial civil court conviction or adverse disposition for more than one felony offense.

13) Civil conviction or other adverse disposition of a felony with three or more offenses (convictions or other adverse dispositions) other than traffic.

14) Subject of initial civil court conviction or other adverse dispositions for sale, distribution, or trafficking (including “Intent To”) of cannabis (marijuana), or any other controlled substance.

15) Applicants having history of chronic cannabis (marijuana) use or psychological cannabis dependence.

16) Persons with prior service last discharged from any Component of the Armed Forces for drug or alcohol abuse, or as rehab failure during their last period of service.

17) Three or more convictions or other adverse dispositions for driving while intoxicated, drugged, or impaired in the 5 years preceding application for enlistment.

18) Persons with convictions or other adverse dispositions for 5 or more misdemeanors preceding application for enlistment.


12 posted on 09/10/2008 12:10:59 AM PDT by Soliton (> 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TINS
Get real! If ANY of this were true, you can bet the political enemies she stepped on a couple of years ago would have spread it around. Think they didn't do snoop research?

Levi may wish he had put off being a father for a while longer, but that pic. of him kissing baby Trig while Bristol held him says he is right at home in that family and has a lot of love for them all.

I hope McCain's campaign sues this slime mag.like they threatened to do.

vaudine

13 posted on 09/10/2008 12:14:33 AM PDT by vaudine (RO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TINS
Get real! If ANY of this were true, you can bet the political enemies she stepped on a couple of years ago would have spread it around. Think they didn't do snoop research?

Levi may wish he had put off being a father for a while longer, but that pic. of him kissing baby Trig while Bristol held him says he is right at home in that family and has a lot of love for them all.

I hope McCain's campaign sues this slime mag.like they threatened to do.

vaudine

14 posted on 09/10/2008 12:14:34 AM PDT by vaudine (RO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

They have a whole team in AK trying to dig up dirt on Palin.
They can kiss it.


15 posted on 09/10/2008 12:14:55 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TINS

Uh huh.
So if the kid of the veep supposedly took drugs at parties, this is more worse than the man who is actually running for President admitting cocaine use?

I see.

National Inquirer did research and uncover some big secret with Edwards, everybody knew about it.
They’ve also have written plenty of bullshit about people and have been sued.

They are handing out money to “sources” to talk trash.
Nobody believes it. Go look at the polls.

Now doesn’t that make you sad?


16 posted on 09/10/2008 12:14:55 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Bring it on. This will only make the Palin family stronger, and will make the media look more petty.

Bonus point if anyone can tie it to the Obama camp.


17 posted on 09/10/2008 12:16:22 AM PDT by Rodney Dangerfield (Sarah makes Arnold look like a girlie man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

So wheres the story.


18 posted on 09/10/2008 12:16:32 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (The Difference Between Palin and Obama is Common Sense, She's GOT IT, He DOESN'T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

Sorry, I didn’t mean to leave the word “more” in my post.
I know ‘more worse’ is not proper grammar.
lol


19 posted on 09/10/2008 12:16:59 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

Thanks for the reminder of Service rules.


20 posted on 09/10/2008 12:17:02 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson