Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: machogirl

They get one story right and now think they are reliable media?

Disgusting doesn’t even begin to meet my ire over this continual bashing of a woman’s family.

SInce they have been ruled a magazine and not the “press” in prior lawsuits, they should be forced to reveal their “anonymous sources,” in my non attorney opinion.


7 posted on 09/10/2008 12:00:23 AM PDT by DakotaRed (Don't you wish you had supported a conservative when you had the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DakotaRed

i agree, let’s hear who is spreading the slime.

This is an example where the press’ “first amendment” (anonymous, never have to reveal sources) rights are the downside. There may not even be “anonymous sources”.

They can make it up and can’t be challenged to reveal.

Wonder where the Obama-Ayers-etc. connections are going to be displayed in the Enquirer.


9 posted on 09/10/2008 12:03:39 AM PDT by machogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson