1 posted on
09/09/2008 1:03:06 PM PDT by
Perdogg
To: Perdogg
Printing and mailing 5 extra issues cost nothing compared to the loss of advertising revenue from a canceled subscription.
2 posted on
09/09/2008 1:06:06 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Whale oil: the renewable biofuel for the 21st century.)
To: Perdogg
Looky there. Spankings do work. Who’da thunk!
3 posted on
09/09/2008 1:07:16 PM PDT by
RobinOfKingston
(Man, that's stupid ... even by congressional standards.)
To: Perdogg
Winter is coming. Makes good kindling.
4 posted on
09/09/2008 1:09:27 PM PDT by
Ron in Acreage
(Sarah Palin: The liberals worst nightmare.)
To: Perdogg
Saw the mag today at the store. I took all the copies and turned the magazine cover around, showing the back panel ad only.
5 posted on
09/09/2008 1:10:31 PM PDT by
rintense
(Palin 2012 for President!)
To: Perdogg
Makes me want to go get a subscription just so I can turn around and cancel it.
To: Perdogg
Instead of 5 free issues, why don’t they show the NEXT cover to be a picture of Sarah and Todd hugging, and a nice wholesome article abouat their family and their LOVE.
Five free issues of more bias is worthless.
To: Perdogg
Why would someone want five extra copies of a magazine they’re cancelling?
8 posted on
09/09/2008 1:11:23 PM PDT by
popdonnelly
(I'll tell you a little secret: We're smarter and more competent than the Left.)
To: Perdogg
Why would I want 5 pieces of crap, even if it is free?
10 posted on
09/09/2008 1:14:17 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(Now you know why the needles on compasses point north - Sarah Palin.)
To: Perdogg
Heh-heh.
And what will the cover stories be on those five “free” issues?
“THE BOOKS SARAH PALIN TRIED TO BAN”
“WHY MICHELLE’S CHILDREN ADORE HER”
“EXCLUSIVE MISS ALASKA 1982 DRESSING ROOM PHOTOS”
“BARACK’S MANLY STYLE”
and:
“RIGHT-WING WACKO WHO WOULD BE VP”
To: Perdogg
No thanks. I hope they print my email I sent to them and everyone on my email list asking them to target the advertisers in US WEEKLY.
12 posted on
09/09/2008 1:15:08 PM PDT by
JFC
(McCain/Palin 08 BASE IS RALLIED!)
To: Perdogg
I would cancel my subscription to Us Weekly, but the chances of me actually having a subscription to that trashy magazine is precisely zero.
16 posted on
09/09/2008 1:20:43 PM PDT by
gridlock
(HIX IN STIX DIG MCCAIN CHICK PICK)
To: Perdogg
20 posted on
09/09/2008 1:28:58 PM PDT by
woollyone
("When the tide is low, even a shrimp has its own puddle." - Vance Havner)
To: Perdogg
So they are lying when they say the boycott of the magazine and advertisers is having no impact.
It is apparently having a HUGE impact.
23 posted on
09/09/2008 1:37:01 PM PDT by
mabelkitty
(Obama thanks McCain for not questioning his Muslim faith)
To: Perdogg
25 posted on
09/09/2008 1:42:33 PM PDT by
lionheart 247365
(( S.P.E.C.I A.L.= ,,,,,,,, Sarrah Palin's Executive Credentials Intimidate Angry Liberals ))
To: Perdogg
The advertisers are feeling the heat!
Wwwwwwwwwaaaaaaahhhh
26 posted on
09/09/2008 1:42:46 PM PDT by
Carley
(she's all out of caribou.............)
To: Perdogg
The advertisers are feeling the heat!
Wwwwwwwwwaaaaaaahhhh
27 posted on
09/09/2008 1:42:57 PM PDT by
Carley
(she's all out of caribou.............)
To: Perdogg; sit-rep
That’s like a restaurant offering you free dessert after you get food poisoning.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson