Posted on 09/09/2008 7:54:33 AM PDT by TSchmereL
AND NOW (or maybe later this week) . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, Maha-Rushie! America's Anchorman, Truth Detector, Doctor of Democracy, and Chief of the Patriotism Police. He is the man who runs America. He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to do--That's host. Get ready to what you were born to do--That's listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).
The key point Obamessiah made was that “rich people” should be paying more than waitresses. He refused to concede that this is INCOME REDISTRIBUTION and a SOCIALIST tenet, much as O’Reilly tried to get him to just freakin’ admit it.
I don’t think it was too difficult. If I remember correctly (I’ve been taking down yard decorations all week so..) I think it was just a wire almost rectangle (3 sides) and the sign slipped over that frame.
Too bad O’Reilly didn’t say “There’s nothing wrong with you paying more, IF YOU CHOOSE TO, but having the government holding a gun to your head forcing you to pay more is SOCIALISM, you jackass!”
Who knew?
BOR wouldn’t say that, because he buys into a lot of the populist BS himself.
“but having the government holding a gun to your head forcing you to pay more is SOCIALISM, you jackass!
Again. In Obama’s mind socialism is just being “NEIGHBORLY” I just about fell out my chair when he said that
I think he spells it Pflouffe or some such nonsense like that. I signed up during the primary to get Obama and Hillary email. Never received very many messages. After Sarah Palin was announced, I get 2-3 a day. I say they are scared.
.....don't make me come over there.
Thanks, IMPR.
I made a donation on McCains site and bought a bumper sticker ...wonder when I’ll see that. Probably Nov 3rd?
That is true and they are in favor of liberals, they do their best to promote a dim and when reality is evident to all, they come out with REAL numbers so they can keep their credibility until the next election.
Look at the past with these pollsters and youll also see the present and the future.
mornin Girlie Girl....I woke early ( 3 a.m.) so thought I would check FRepublic which sucked cause nothing would load....So listened to Imus........
..Imus was hillarious attacking Overbite/ Matthews
“Biden wets himselfe when Palin’s name is mentioned”
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bill Ayers: Violent resistance not necessarily the answer
How long after todays statement will we hear Barack Obama declare that this is not the Bill Ayers that I knew? Unfortunately for Obama, Ayers continues to show that hes the same unrepentant domestic terrorist we all knew, and whom Obama called mainstream on his campaign site until his team wisely scrubbed it in the spring. In a cartoon on his site, Ayers doesnt express an ounce of remorse for his campaign of violence and terror.
Heres the full statement, as provided by Jake Tapper, who cant believe the part I bolded:
First, lets get the quote back into its context, which Ayers elides in this new spin. The entire quote was I dont regret setting bombs. I feel we didnt do enough. He clearly was talking tactics in the context of that quote, and nothing he says today changes that.
But even beyond that, Ayers offers no remorse at all for his actions. He never even offers the possibility that he should apologize for his crimes. In the September 2001 article that ran on the day that 3,000 Americans died in terrorist attacks, Ayers said that hed consider doing it all over again:
And in todays statement, Ayers says that violent resistance is not necessarily the answer as if in a democracy, one has to consider that among the options for political change. Is that what Barack Obama calls mainstream? Under what circumstances would Obama see violent resistance in America as a mainstream option?
The more one sees and hears from Bill Ayers, the clearer Obamas connections to radicals becomes. Hopefully, we will hear even more from Ayers and Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger in the next eight weeks.
thx for the heads up......so basically a half assed effort from one BOR
BOR is a populist w/ bb’s for brass
That propaganda is on the Huffington Post.
“hx for the heads up......so basically a half assed effort from one BOR”
For BOR it was a good job (and better than most MSM interviews) I just wish BOR would stop with the passive-aggressive “I agree with you Barack” crap.
Just ask the questions and followup, no need to try and become the guy’s best buddy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.