Obama is not up in CO. Look at the numbers: +14% net favorable in favor of McCain. We have GOT to be ahead there.
Of course I forgive you. But that’s not a simple mistake for someone of your caliber (if you lead me to believe so). You aren’t examining the possibilites. Besides, adding CO puts Obama at 273 - squarely over the 270 he needs. If we win NH then it’s a “tie” (we lose). My Western strategy is two pronged: NM and CO. NM will get us to 270 if we lose CO and IA. CO gets us to 274 if we lose NM and IA. All the other states I am banking on (I’m not suggesting we don’t need to shore them up even a lot). Court them both HARD and win just one (we win). We are ahead at least slightly in CO, that’s what the Rasmussen numbers tell me.
I was assuming McCain takes NH. He’s alwasy done well there. Your post is a good example of why I don’t frame these things in terms of Obama. There are numerous possible winning combinations on both sides. I didn’t include your favorite so you chided me.
I’m off to bed. I have almost as many children as Sarah Palin and a full day tomorrow.
We need NV and CO to win.