Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Call The Rush Limbaugh Show program line between 12 Noon and 3PM Eastern Time at: 1-800-282-2882

E-mail Rush: ElRushbo@eibnet.com

Fax Rush at: 212-445-3963

Write a letter to Rush and mail it to:

The Rush Limbaugh Show
1270 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020

Join This Ping List Now! Click Here To Join this Ping List!

1 posted on 09/08/2008 8:18:42 AM PDT by TSchmereL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Chuck54; damnyankee57; KeepingFaith; pollywog; Fawn; bluerose; mmanager; They'reGone2000; ...
Calling all Ditto Heads, True Conservatives, El Conservo Tribe Members, and Operation Chaos Agents!
2 posted on 09/08/2008 8:19:09 AM PDT by TSchmereL ("Rust but terrify.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL

Once again, thanks for the ping! I may actually get some work done today since Rush is out.


8 posted on 09/08/2008 8:24:41 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (I'd rather have Palin a hearbeat away from than to have Obama be the heartbeat of the Presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL

Palin in Debate [Byron York]

I just finished watching a video on C-Span’s website of the August, 2006 Republican debate in the Alaska governor’s race. It pitted Frank Murkowski, the then-governor of the state and veteran of 22 years in the U.S. Senate, against Republican politician John Binkley and Wasilla mayor Sarah Palin. And all I have to say is that Palin was good — really good. It wasn’t a debate in which the candidates were in each other’s faces or throwing out zingers, but Palin clearly outshone her rivals — especially Murkowski, the longtime senator who played the role of the experienced statesman.

As far as substance was concerned, the debate was heavy — I mean heavy — on oil, natural gas, and the money that comes therefrom. To my ears, Palin knew a great deal about the subject and spoke with real authority about it — again outshining her rivals.

On a few other issues, there was a passage in the debate that will lay to rest all those reports we have seen that Palin supports abstinence-only education when it comes to sex. It seems Palin had written in a questionnaire that she opposed “explicit” sex-ed programs, so she was asked:

In a recent survey you said that you would support abstinence-until-marriage education but that you would not support explicit sex-ed programs. What are explicit sex-ed programs, and does that include talking about condoms in school?

Palin’s answer:

No, I don’t think that it includes something that is relatively benign. Explicit means explicit. No, I am pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I’m not anti-contraception. But yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don’t have a problem with that. That doesn’t scare me, so it’s something that I would support also.

Finally, Alaska does not have a death penalty — I did not know that — and Palin was asked for her opinion. Her answer was that if the state legislature decided to pass a narrowly focused death penalty, she would support it.

If our lawmakers were to consider such a thing, I think that support should be given for heinous crimes. A murder of a child? I say, my goodness, hang ‘em up. Yeah. A murder of a child, anything to such a degree, I don’t think that there can be anything worse. And if lawmakers were to consider it, that should be the consideration.

If you have time, you should definitely watch the debate.

09/08 08:23 AM


19 posted on 09/08/2008 8:32:45 AM PDT by roses of sharon (READ MY LIPSTICK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL

MOCKING OPRAH FOR NOT HAVING SARAH ON HER SHOW - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXyR0oGadX0


24 posted on 09/08/2008 8:41:28 AM PDT by doug from upland (8 million views of HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Gentlemen (and women) ... start your post-mortum analyzing. FWIW a journalism student's take on the RNC.

TV: More sexism, more self-promotion

Last week the RNC held their convention at the Xcel Energy Center in Minneapolis and The NewsHour and Democracy Now! covered the convention. It wasn't pretty for anyone but the GOP.

Let's start with the convention itself which we watched like anthropologists studying another culture. ...

The 'fear card' was not played at the RNC convention. Let's dispel that myth right from the start. The fear card was played at the Democratic Party convention in Denver -- over and over, as they attempted to say that John McCain was exactly like the Bully Boy. ...

9-11 is not just a 'hot button' issue to the Republican base, it is an indication of what they see as the differences offered in leadership from the two parties. That's a very important point and one that those killing trees with all their useless 'how to win!' books better start grasping. After nearly seven years, you'd think they'd have figured out something but their bad (and banal) writing demonstrates no knowledge learned or even that basic facts have been grasped. ...

Those wrongly insisting the Republican convention offered nothing are begging to lose every election because they refuse to see what really went down. ...

Minor perceptions were utilized as well. One example would be the wrongful stereotype that Democrats don't give a damn about the country. John McCain's military service was stressed, Palin's son and nephew being in the service was stressed, the men and women serving was stressed. "We stand up in time of need!" was the call. ...

Utilizing perception management, the convention played to why people identify as Republicans to begin with. Palin would give a crowd pleasing speech (and an amazing speech) on Wednesday night but the convention all week was about solidifying the base behind the ticket. ...

That's what the Democrats didn't grasp. That's why their convention flopped. They didn't manage perception. They insisted upon making the entire convention about Barack. ... Reality is that the Republicans were no more solidified behind McCain in the primaries than Democrats were behind Barack. ... Republicans used a winner-take-all strategy for awarding delegates from each state and they did so because that's how it works in the general election for the electoral college. ... They're not interested in soothing egos, they're interested in winning. They aren't interested in a primary system that allows stragglers to stay in the race, they're interested in finding out who is the strongest candidate. ...

The Democratic 'leadership' seemed truly confused that the unfair system could backfire on them. ... They thought they could run their crooked and rigged system and appoint a leader who was not popular with the base. As it dawned on them (due to polling) they decided they could 'heal' the wounds by selling Barack throughout the convention. It was an embarrassment and it wasn't effective.

If Barack loses ... It will be noted, in higher toned language, that speech after speech informing people how 'groovy' Barack was really wasn't the way to drive Democrats to the polls. It will be noted that the gauzy sop tossed out over and over about Barack was issue-free and, as it repeatedly stressed how 'groovy' Barack was, only made the point he must not be so 'groovy' if everyone can't shut up about it and get to the issues that matter. ...

On every level, the Republican convention was a success. ...

[Laura Bush and Cindy McCain] managed to send the message (true or false) that the Republicans were about the American people and after Barack's latest bit of vanity, it was a highly effective moment. Democrats closed asking America to worship one man. Republicans opened asking Americans to pull together.

36 posted on 09/08/2008 8:58:43 AM PDT by Milhous (Gn 22:17 your descendants shall take possession of the gates of their enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL
Are Palin's Eyeglasses the New Pantsuit?

hehehe...

38 posted on 09/08/2008 9:04:00 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my McCain! GO SARAHCUDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL

Hi all..Little Chief RunningBare is here, but Rush taking a day off?? I want to hear what his take is on the poll saying McCain is up 10 on Hussien Obama now!!


41 posted on 09/08/2008 9:05:20 AM PDT by RightWingTeen (Support FREE education - Homeschool and FREE your kids from SOCIALISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Heap Big Chief Sitting Bullsh*t Repeller here!


48 posted on 09/08/2008 9:10:14 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Cure your electile dysfunction - vote Sarah-cuda! "O is for Obama, Oprah, and Over" ~polymuser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL

Dang! Just as I was getting back into a needing a fix of Rush lately, he goes and takes a day off.


56 posted on 09/08/2008 9:13:40 AM PDT by CSM ("Conservobabes are hot. Libitches are not." - stolen from rightinthemiddle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL
Here ... work N lurk mode ON.
95 posted on 09/08/2008 9:29:32 AM PDT by sono (Nobama! Nobiden! Nobull!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TSchmereL

112 posted on 09/08/2008 9:38:02 AM PDT by doug from upland (8 million views of HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson