Too many Isikoff lies to deal with this early in the morning.
mark for later
Stopped reading right there. Perhaps Mr. Isikoff might want to revisit that statement. The simple fact, as uncomfortable as it might be for Isikoff to admit, is that the democrats agreed with the Pres. Look at their votes & look at their statements of support.
This is the same nitwit who reported, falsely, on the Koran that was flushed down the loo at Gitmo. And then, after something like 15 people were killed in riots his report sparked, he withdrew the report, saying that as it turned out, the report was incorrect.
This schmuck has blood on his hands. He's the last person that should be critical of Horowitz.
ping
Horowitz is a BIG dog, Isikoff is a flea..
Isikoff calls Horowitz partisan. Enough said.
The UN wrecked the whole country of Iraq and let the weak die and Saddam Hussein to murder at will so the UN could get rich from the oil-for-food corruption.
That's why no WMD was found in Iraq, Saddam had the effects of potent WMD through the corrupt UN.
Making actual poisons causes a mess you have to eventually clean. Who needs that hassle when you have the UN?
btt
Wow did somebody put a burr under Isikoff’s saddle?
I am unapologetic in my support for the war in Iraq. Iraq was crawling with terrorists in 2003. SH would have acquired WMD when the sanctions were lifted. The combination of a sanctuary for terrorists, SH, and WMD is frightening. Bush could have taken the easy road and let this threat pass to the next president. Iran is the best evidence that the Iraq war was necessary. Iran is a rogue state with WMD. Iraq would have been much worse than Iran.
Regardless of your opinion about the necessity of the GW2, the rat behavior in the occupation stage has been treasoness. They have put our brave men and women in grave danger by encouraging the enemy. How many have died because of the relentless criticism of our president and our brave men and women in uniform? If the treasoness rats had prevailed, we would have had an embarrassing retreat and Iraq would have turned into a terrorist state just like Afganistan. A terrorist Iraq would have been a much more grave threat than Afganistan because of Iraq’s immmense oil wealth.
Has David Horowitz exhibited one instance in which he doesn’t have total credibility? How is Isikoff on credibility?
And there’s a dispute why?
Try again, Mikey...It's the Clintons who were unable to make distinctions. You were for 'em or Agin' 'em, and if you were agin' 'em you were a part of the VRWC.