1 posted on
09/07/2008 5:45:24 PM PDT by
sionnsar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: NicknamedBob
2 posted on
09/07/2008 5:47:08 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(Obama?Bye-den!|Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)| The New WSJ Magazine is disgusting)
To: sionnsar
Yep just what we need, start screwing with things we have no idea about.
3 posted on
09/07/2008 5:47:41 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(No More Obama - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
To: sionnsar
Oh, Lord, the mad scientists are loose!
4 posted on
09/07/2008 5:47:59 PM PDT by
expatpat
To: sionnsar
“Cloud-seeding ships could combat climate change”
In the same way that a blind ant might battle an elephant....
5 posted on
09/07/2008 5:49:03 PM PDT by
EyeGuy
To: sionnsar
We're having enough trouble with cloud formations out over the ocean, thank you very much.
6 posted on
09/07/2008 5:50:46 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(don't worry, they only want to take water out of the other guy's side of the bucket.)
To: sionnsar
The lawyers will eat this proposal up when it changes certain local climates for the negative.
Did that seeding cause the last hurricane?
To: sionnsar
8 posted on
09/07/2008 5:51:33 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(Obama?Bye-den!|Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)| The New WSJ Magazine is disgusting)
To: sionnsar
See, that’s what happens when they put down Dungeons & Dragons for a while and try to think.
9 posted on
09/07/2008 5:52:00 PM PDT by
tbpiper
(Obama/Biden: Instead of Ebony and Ivory, we have Arrogance and Insolence.)
To: sionnsar
No no no no no no
I hang my head in shame.
10 posted on
09/07/2008 5:53:02 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(Single dudes for hockey moms.)
To: sionnsar
To: sionnsar
Is this to fight globull warming or the coming ice age? It’s hard to tell without a score card.
Either way, WERE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!
12 posted on
09/07/2008 5:56:09 PM PDT by
Clay Moore
("Bro, face it. You (print media) guys are the 8-track cassette of news")
To: sionnsar
13 posted on
09/07/2008 5:57:10 PM PDT by
airedale
( XZ)
To: sionnsar
The global warming scam is bad enough without the kooks doing things to control climate. The present cooling trend will put a chill on this nonsense soon enough.
17 posted on
09/07/2008 6:02:58 PM PDT by
pallis
To: sionnsar
Every “idea” the loony envirowackos come up with usually ends up only making matters worse. Look at our “pristine” forests that our burning down because they are no longer being managed properly. They all need to go sit on one of those smokestacks and stop screwing around with the planet.
18 posted on
09/07/2008 6:03:58 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(McCain/Palin '08! Real change you won't have to "believe in." You'll be able to see it!!!)
To: sionnsar
Nuts; I liked it better when they proposed dumping liquid methane above the tropopause to make more ozone; amounts to the same thing and it could be done with just a few space flights.
Or, they could just leave the earth alone and maybe it’ll keep on spinning unimpeded and unaltered.
23 posted on
09/07/2008 6:12:12 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: sionnsar
The lack of sunspots should lead to increased gamma radiation. That will increase cloud nucleation. There is no need for this silliness. If anything, it will accelerate what may well be the leading edge of another ice age. If you think warming is bad, just try growing crops in the snow.
24 posted on
09/07/2008 6:15:36 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: sionnsar
This is getting comical. The arrogance and idiocy is astounding.
25 posted on
09/07/2008 6:21:14 PM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Been here before)
To: sionnsar
The Soviets boasted back in the 70s that they could change the weather by seeding with silver iodide via bombers. Turned out to be just another fraudulent claim.
During the Olympics, China boasted that their seeding efforts swept the smog out of Beijing in time for the Opening Ceremonies. No proof whatsoever to suggest that they even lifted a finger to alter the climate so as to bring about wind to blow the pollutants away.
We’re specks of dust on this planet. To think otherwise is vanity.
26 posted on
09/07/2008 6:23:15 PM PDT by
goarmy
(How long do you simmer moose stew?)
To: sionnsar
Well it’s definitely a better method of fighting climate change than imposing taxes to stop you from doing things, like the demoncrats want to do.
Not to mention it cost a lot less than welfare:
Cost of Welfare in 2000: $434.4 billion
Cost of building these ships: about $5.3 billion
In other words this cost about 1/100 of the cost of welfare.
Not to mention that building these ships probably makes more jobs than putting people on welfare.
To: sionnsar
Somebody clue these people in.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23583376-7583,00.html
We going through a remarkable period of no sunspots. Last time like this was the little ice age.
28 posted on
09/07/2008 6:27:36 PM PDT by
blasater1960
( Dt 30, Ps 111, The Torah is perfect, attainable, now and forever)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson