Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DRey

Is there anyone here who thinks that this could be true? I mean, wasn’t there talk about Palin’s daughter being out of school for a long period of time? I don’t know Sarah Palin, so I can’t know what really happened. I know Palin said she had the baby and then went right back to work the next day. I don’t know, it’s all confusing to me. I hope it isn’t true.


150 posted on 09/07/2008 4:36:42 PM PDT by fox0566
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: fox0566

DU TROLL ALERT


161 posted on 09/07/2008 4:37:55 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (McCain-Sarah 08...Dont stop believin....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566

I don’t believe this “developing” story for 1 second. Advice to Palin and McCain.. don’t comment.. let the NYT hang itself, for if this is true and there is ANY story on their baby, any story at all, the outcry will be tremendous... it will doom the NYT.

and it will only further the McCain/Palin cause.


170 posted on 09/07/2008 4:39:58 PM PDT by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566; DRey
Is there anyone here who thinks that this could be true? I mean, wasn’t there talk about Palin’s daughter being out of school for a long period of time? I don’t know Sarah Palin, so I can’t know what really happened. I know Palin said she had the baby and then went right back to work the next day. I don’t know, it’s all confusing to me. I hope it isn’t true.

Trig Palin was born April 18, 2008.

Bristol is five months pregnant, which means she conceived sometime in March or early April.

It is physically IMPOSSIBLE for Bristol to be Trig's mother, even the leftists have dropped this pathetic theory.

The ONLY reason they came up with the sick story that Bristol was Trig's mother is because it was fairly well known in Wasilla that Bristol was pregnant. The left jumped to conclusions and assumed that she was Trig's mother.

208 posted on 09/07/2008 4:44:29 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566

I also hope that they dont run an expose about odumbo admitting to his muslim faith on you tube, just hoping thats all


226 posted on 09/07/2008 4:48:25 PM PDT by italianquaker (Great choice Mccain in Governor Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566
Is there anyone here who thinks that this could be true?

No, for two reasons: (1) There are several pictures out there showing Gov. Palin demonstrably pregnant earlier this year; and (2) What is the purpose for hiding a pregnant daughter? Politically speaking, even if Gov. Palin were to stay in Alaska and not go any further, she still has political enemies who'd love to gut her because of her reformist bent. Her lying about anything would doom her, particularly in a situation like this.

237 posted on 09/07/2008 4:49:28 PM PDT by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566
I know Palin said she had the baby and then went right back to work the next day.

Show me, I've never heard Gov. Palin make this statement or anyone else say such a thing.

247 posted on 09/07/2008 4:50:40 PM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566
Is there anyone here who thinks that this could be true? I mean, wasn’t there talk about Palin’s daughter being out of school for a long period of time? I don’t know Sarah Palin, so I can’t know what really happened. I know Palin said she had the baby and then went right back to work the next day. I don’t know, it’s all confusing to me. I hope it isn’t true.

No. I don't think there is anyone here that thinks this could be true. Only trolls and DU'ers believe this cr*p.

Are you the former, the latter or both?

250 posted on 09/07/2008 4:51:16 PM PDT by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566

255 posted on 09/07/2008 4:51:44 PM PDT by A. Morgan (VOTE FOR A LIBERAL N' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS and OUTA' GAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566

Who cares if it’s true or not? I just want a VP who will kick some socialist ass.


362 posted on 09/07/2008 5:05:47 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566
It could be true but highly unlikely. I mean, I never expected Mr. Amnesty to be the Rep. nominee.

I know of one woman who worked until the day she delivered her baby. I don't know anyone who went back the next day.

I personally believe this is a slander. Palin would have to be totally corrupt and stupid to have claimed her daughter's child is hers. She would lose everything she has worked for and be convicted of insurance fraud. Imagine how many people would be involved in this kind of conspiracy. Palin is too smart to trust such a secret to a loser like Bristol who is bound to babble. Makes no sense for her to have done it unless she is a sociopath and there are no signs of that.

Since unfortunately many people will believe anything the media reports and time is running out, she should take a DNA test and then sue those who slandered her.

447 posted on 09/07/2008 5:21:24 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

To: fox0566

If its true, how could Bristol be 5 monthes pregnant now? Its just dumb!


597 posted on 09/07/2008 6:15:09 PM PDT by beckysueb (Drill here! Drill now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson