Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fox0566; DRey
Is there anyone here who thinks that this could be true? I mean, wasn’t there talk about Palin’s daughter being out of school for a long period of time? I don’t know Sarah Palin, so I can’t know what really happened. I know Palin said she had the baby and then went right back to work the next day. I don’t know, it’s all confusing to me. I hope it isn’t true.

Trig Palin was born April 18, 2008.

Bristol is five months pregnant, which means she conceived sometime in March or early April.

It is physically IMPOSSIBLE for Bristol to be Trig's mother, even the leftists have dropped this pathetic theory.

The ONLY reason they came up with the sick story that Bristol was Trig's mother is because it was fairly well known in Wasilla that Bristol was pregnant. The left jumped to conclusions and assumed that she was Trig's mother.

208 posted on 09/07/2008 4:44:29 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson