[goldstategop]

What's the sample of these two dozen women? Income, party affiliation, religion, ethnic background and ideology? Without an identifiable set of criteria we don't know if the reported responses are true. There's no way they can be independently checked. We must take the Times reporters' account at face value.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[healy61]

What is the margin of error? + or - 22.5 %. Fer cryin out loud.

[Question Liberal Authority]

I’d bet money that the 2 dozen women “interviewed” all worked at a topless nightclub, and the whole evening was expensed as “field research”.

[FredZarguna]

"And -- I'll be danged -- it was Obama,"

Is this the way idiots in California think people from Pennsylvania talk? I'll be danged? Seriously? Hell they don't even talk that way in West Virginia anymore. Was the LA Times reporterette channeling Marshal McCloud in some bong haze or what?

We've also got a quote from a 63 year-oldlifelong feminist in Uniontown. Sure.

Forget about the confidence interval on a non-random sample of 24 fictional Pennsylvanians; my bullsh!tometer has gone of the scale. It's just push polling, and not even very sophisticated push polling at that.

Dang? Dang? You jag-offs in California make me laugh.