polarik wrote:
“Sorry, but you’ll have to use visuals here if you want me to see what you see, and also, define what you mean by “dots.””
If someone could tell me how to post pictures here I would. But the dots are clearly visible so I don’t know why it would be necessary. And what I mean by dots is dots. Like the period at the end of this sentence. A dot. And if you look at the date stamp in photo 7 there is a dot between the J and the U at the tops of the letters. There is also a dot at the crook of the 7 where the horizontal part of the 7 meets the vertical part of the 7. And there is a dot just to the right of the bottom of the 7. These are clearly visible to me and should be clearly visible to others.
But if you look at your overlaid picture, there are pairs of dots in those locations. If the date stamps perfectly matched then there should only be the three dots that I mentioned above and not three pairs of dots. The letters and numbers don’t look perfectly matched either. The easiest to see is the bottom ends of the two J’s don’t match. One is offset from the other. The dark parts appear to be where the date stamps of the two images overlap each other and the lighter parts are part of one date stamp or the other and show that the date stamps aren’t perfectly matched.
That should take care of the extraneous dots.