Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; Norman Bates; LdSentinal; ExTexasRedhead; ...
This is why the DemocRATS resorted to smear campaigns against justices like Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas and, to a lesser degree, Samuel Alito, because they know that the public doesn’t back their goals on the courts.
2 posted on
09/06/2008 2:17:17 AM PDT by
Clintonfatigued
(If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
To: Clintonfatigued
What does the other 40% think the decisions should be based on? Coin flips?
3 posted on
09/06/2008 2:17:51 AM PDT by
Tublecane
To: Clintonfatigued
Oh, I see, the poll says, “the judges sense of fairness and justice.” Why do we spend so much money on paper to print laws on when we can just ask a judge what to do?
4 posted on
09/06/2008 2:19:53 AM PDT by
Tublecane
To: Clintonfatigued
5 posted on
09/06/2008 2:23:54 AM PDT by
Charlespg
(Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
To: Clintonfatigued
That headline is quite disturbing. The fact that only 60% want the Supremes to follow the Constitution is appalling. To think 40% of the public thinks (or has no opinion) that judges could rule by personal opinion/fiat is insane. We can blame that on the public schools/university ultraleftist brainwashing.
6 posted on
09/06/2008 2:25:16 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Clintonfatigued
Just 11% of McCain supporters say judges should rule based on the judges sense of fairness, while nearly half (49%) of Obama supporters agree. What kind of "backwards speech" is this jerk using?
7 posted on
09/06/2008 2:27:42 AM PDT by
jws3sticks
(Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
To: Clintonfatigued
Only 60% thinks the Supreme Court should use the Constitution as the basis of their decisions?
Is 40% of our nation really that uneducated?
10 posted on
09/06/2008 2:39:19 AM PDT by
counterpunch
(Country First)
To: Clintonfatigued
Like Bullwinkle they pull rulings out of their UM hat.
11 posted on
09/06/2008 2:41:14 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: Clintonfatigued
60% agree with the McCain (actually the position of the constitution itself) position, yet Obama is still ahead (he will lose) in most national polls. This is truly amazing to me.
If Barack Hussein Obama had had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be an uncertain threat who would slipped the Oil for Food embargo and broken out to join Iran in its race for nuclear weapons. Yet this dullard Obama is still able to claim he was right on the Iraq war, a war he never could have voted for if he'd wanted to.
12 posted on
09/06/2008 2:43:16 AM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Obama: vain, mercurial, inexperienced, aloof, condescending, doctrinaire, and Reverend Wright's son.)
To: Clintonfatigued
while 30% say rulings should be guided on the judges sense of fairness and justice. I guess this 30% want an absolute monarch; a benevolent king dispensing justice from a high throne.
18 posted on
09/06/2008 3:05:23 AM PDT by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Most American voters (60%) agrees and says the Supreme Court should make decisions based on what is written in the constitution, while 30% say rulings should be guided on the judges sense of fairness and justice.Those that say rulings should be guided on the judge's sense of fairness and justice have disordered minds. If the sky is blue we should not say the sky is yellow to be fair.
The constitution, if considered unfair should be changed per the route described by law. More people should understand the basic precepts of citizenship in the community, citizenship in the nation, and citizenship in the world.
19 posted on
09/06/2008 3:25:52 AM PDT by
olezip
To: Clintonfatigued
Most American voters (60%) agrees and says the Supreme Court should make decisions based on what is written in the constitution, while 30% say rulings should be guided on the judges sense of fairness and justice
None of which matters if we do consider ourselves a Nation of Laws. The Constitutuion REQUIRES that the Supreme Coourt rule on legality (constitutionality) and nothing else.
Either we are going to follow the Constitution and be America or we are not. It does not work going halfway.
23 posted on
09/06/2008 4:16:00 AM PDT by
SECURE AMERICA
( Choice 2008 McCain =Hero, Obama = Zero. Palin = Fresh - Biden = Stale)
To: Clintonfatigued
They’re deliberately using the wrong words. They’re talking about changes in cultural mores vs the constitution on its’ face.
24 posted on
09/06/2008 4:18:53 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
To: Clintonfatigued
What scares the hell out of me is it should be 100% I am a realist though and realize there is a level of idiocy in any social group, however I think that should only account for 2%-6%.
25 posted on
09/06/2008 4:35:12 AM PDT by
Woodman
("One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives." PW)
To: Clintonfatigued; All
To: Clintonfatigued
Nice to see the number supporting actual interpretation has gone up. Makes me wonder why so many people trust judges to make law from the bench.
28 posted on
09/06/2008 4:59:21 AM PDT by
borisbob69
(The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Ec 10-2 NIV)
To: Clintonfatigued
Kind of scary that only 60% of the populationm believes in our Constitution.
29 posted on
09/06/2008 5:02:54 AM PDT by
oldvike
To: Clintonfatigued
Only 60% We’re in trouble.
30 posted on
09/06/2008 5:07:55 AM PDT by
arthurus
(Old age and guile beats youth and enthusiasm.)
To: Clintonfatigued
Part of me wants to say YIPPEE!!!!
And on the other side, I am shaking my head....understanding why the education system is in the pit.....
Truth, is not taught at all.
32 posted on
09/06/2008 5:31:09 AM PDT by
LadyPilgrim
((Lifted up was He to die; It is finished was His cry; Hallelujah what a Savior!!!!!! ))
To: Clintonfatigued
In an unrelated poll, 40% polled believe di-hydrogen-oxygen is a dangerous chemical.
33 posted on
09/06/2008 5:33:20 AM PDT by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson