Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Sarah Palin's Speech Will Not Win Over All Evangelicals
New Republic ^ | 9/4/08 | Alan Wolfe

Posted on 09/04/2008 7:58:19 AM PDT by mathprof

I teach at a Catholic university. I study and write about evangelical Protestants. I have no religious convictions of my own. This bothers people who insist that if you are not yourself religious you cannot possibly "get" religion. I leave it to others to decide whether my lack of faith helps or hinders my capacity to understand the subject. But I do know one thing. Because of where I teach and who I study, I have come across some remarkable people I otherwise would never have met.

Familiar with the Catholic tradition, I cannot say I am surprised to meet learned Catholics with a deeply honed sense of social justice. But I have been taken aback by how many evangelicals to whom I have spoken who think deeply about the obligations we human beings have toward each other, take seriously a command to lead lives of good purpose, and resist having their faith corrupted by the temptations of money and power. Megachurches and Christian colleges and seminaries have more than their share of people who love God and want to make the world a better place.

Sarah Palin's speech last night was rapturously received by the delegates to the Republican convention, most of whom are conservative Christians. But just because most Republicans are conservative Christians does not mean that all conservative Christians are Republican. I have the feeling that Palin's speech will not wear well among many of the primarily younger evangelicals I have come to know.

To be sure, Palin's personal story will resonate with them, especially the story of Trig. (At one evangelical event in Atlanta I attended, I was bowled over by the parents of a quadriplegic child to whom they had clearly devoted their lives; I do not think I have the same level of devotion within me). But three aspects of Palin's speech are likely to bother them.

Evangelicals are becoming increasingly persuaded that Christians are under an injunction to preserve and protect the natural environment bequeathed to us by God. They will not be attracted to destroying the beauty of Alaska to fill our all-too- human urge to drive cars. Christians are from time to time called on to sacrifice for their beliefs, and if we have to cut back our energy consumption to protect God's gift, that is as worthy a sacrifice as there is. Palin rhetorically called for clean energy but her words lacked conviction, especially when compared to her calls to drill and drill some more. This will be noticed.

Palin's speech, secondly, was too partisan to be easily swallowed by younger, post-partisan, evangelicals. These are people who disagree with Barack Obama's position on abortion but respect him as a Christian. Palin's over-the-top sarcasm toward Obama will not play well with them, especially her implicit questioning of his patriotism. To the extent that these younger evangelicals are political, they look for a politics of elevation. The whole tone of last night's convention will prove to be a bit too sour. You do not call for change and adhere to the Rove-Schmitt style of attack.

Finally, and most importantly, Palin did not speak to the powerful sense emerging among evangelicals that all Christians, and not just Catholics, should do their best to insure social justice in this world. On the contrary, Palin mocked Obama's service as a community organizer, an odd thing to do given that so many community organizers are inspired by their religious convictions. Promising to cut taxes appeals to country-club Republicans. It is not nearly as resonant a theme to those who understand that the programs financed by taxes help the neediest and most dependent. If Palin said one word about how to make this world a fairer place or indicated at any point how to realize the common good, I did not hear it.

This is the moment for Sarah Palin to have her day. But great speeches are meant to be digested over long periods. This is not one that future generations of evangelicals will turn to for inspiration.

Alan Wolfe is a TNR contributing editor and director of the Boisi Center for Religion and American Public Life at Boston College.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008rncconvention; agnostics; atheists; christianvote; environment; evangelicals; mccainpalin; palin; palinspeech; rncconvention; tnr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: AnAmericanMother

these are the same people who report one crackpot nun advocating abortion as a MASSIVE GIGANTIC RIFT.

these are the same idiots who believe that the abortion issue is not settled and the pope is still looking at the issue.

for these buffoons 100000000000000000 to 1 against the left wing is portrayed as a 50/50 split.


81 posted on 09/04/2008 8:45:08 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jemian
Alan Wolfe is an excellent example of the soul darkened by selfishness, spittling bitterness from the depth of his emptiness and pretending it's objective analysis. Sadly, this is what a William Ayers style organization to train teachers can accomplish, and these sorts infest even the Catholic Universities.

Happily, if such a man showed up seeking a job at my granddaughter's Church School, he would be interviewed and his resume set aside and he would not be called back for a second look.

The poor fool thinks his essay will persuad young people to turn away from Sarah Palin. I sure hope the clueless continue this abject stupidity for the next two and a half months because every time these dolts expose themselves, more bright young people see the stark contrast of dead soul walkin'. The democrat party is built of such deadness sauntering across America.

82 posted on 09/04/2008 8:47:14 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veritas2002
“Why would someone with no religious convictions want to teach at
a Catholic university?” I asked myself.


Being a Marxist (post 21) agnostic/atheist, propagandizing
young minds...and getting good pay for it. Not to mention the benefits!

SWEET!!!
(/sarc)

These sort of faculty members are just doing what Mohammed Atta
would have done if he'd gotten that Small Business Loan to buy
a crop-duster to spread that anthrax (that the FBI says had to
come from Dr. Ivins).

Using an enemy's own money to destroy them.
That's an erotic fantasy for guys like Wolfe.
83 posted on 09/04/2008 8:48:19 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

You keep using this word, “evangelical”. I do not think you know what it means.


84 posted on 09/04/2008 8:50:11 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

“...not all conservative Christians are Republican.”

But NO conservative Christians are democrats.


85 posted on 09/04/2008 8:51:15 AM PDT by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I have no religious convictions of my own.

How is this possible? Perhaps he is a devout atheist or agnostic but to have no conviction about such an important human question seem absurd.

all Christians, and not just Catholics, should do their best to insure social justice in this world.

Code words for collectivism. I have found that the poor are best served by a healthy and free economy. I have been to Burma and Laos and these are not good places in which to be poor. Singapore is likely the best and it an economy which is consistently rated one of the most free in the world. Even heavily socialized Sweden lags behind.

86 posted on 09/04/2008 8:52:16 AM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I have no religious convictions of my own.

Therefore, he better understands people that do.

Riiiiiiight.

87 posted on 09/04/2008 8:52:39 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Public policy should never become the captive of a scientific-technological elite. -- Ike Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

More from the dolts who think the cliche “social justice” equals religion.


88 posted on 09/04/2008 8:53:00 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

“I study and write about evangelical Protestants. I have no religious convictions of my own.”

That is truely about as clueless AS IT GETS.


89 posted on 09/04/2008 8:53:03 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

If you could find a Christian on the Boston College campus I’d be shocked.


90 posted on 09/04/2008 8:54:58 AM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
younger, post-partisan, evangelicals. These are people who disagree with Barack Obama's position on abortion but respect him as a Christian. Palin's over-the-top sarcasm toward Obama will not play well with them, especially her implicit questioning of his patriotism.

Wolfe has no clue as to Christianity, particularly Evangelicals.

Wolfe is a self-absorbed pagan.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach Adonai
91 posted on 09/04/2008 8:56:28 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 78:35 And they remembered that God was their ROCK, And the Most High God their Redeemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I cannot say I am surprised to meet learned Catholics with a deeply honed sense of social justice.

Ah yes, "social justice". That's where the cat stopped reading. "Social justice". One of the favorite phrases cited often by Thomas Sowell. Here are two of his insights:

"Envy plus rhetoric equals “social justice.” "

"Lofty talk about “social justice” or “fairness” boils down to greatly expanded powers for politicians, since those pretty words have no concrete definition. They are a blank check for creating disparities in power that dwarf disparities in income — and are far more dangerous."

92 posted on 09/04/2008 9:00:17 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Are you ready to pray for Teddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Wolfe
Earlier in his career, Wolfe was a member of the collective that put out the Marxist-oriented journal, Kapitalistate... He served as an advisor to President Bill Clinton in preparation for his 1995 State of the Union Address

Why Conservatives Can't Govern By Alan Wolfe
the best that can be hoped for is that American voters will do for conservatives what they are unable to do themselves: to vote them out of office.

93 posted on 09/04/2008 9:03:24 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I study and write about evangelical Protestants. I have no religious convictions of my own.

Stopped reading right there.

You have to serve somebody ~ Bob Dylan

94 posted on 09/04/2008 9:04:09 AM PDT by afnamvet (COUNTRY FIRST! McCain/Palin 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
One more from Thomas Sowell:

"But "social justice"? No explanation needed. No definition. No facts. Everybody is for it. Do you want social injustice?"

95 posted on 09/04/2008 9:05:27 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Are you ready to pray for Teddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I study and write about evangelical Protestants.

What, are we freaks in a zoo?

96 posted on 09/04/2008 9:05:39 AM PDT by keepitreal ("I'm Barack Obama and I approve this message. . . until I don't.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afnamvet

He obviously does have religious convictions, anti-Christian ones.


97 posted on 09/04/2008 9:06:41 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

“Finally, and most importantly, Palin did not speak to the powerful sense emerging among evangelicals that all Christians, and not just Catholics, should do their best to insure social justice in this world.”

I think the faux “evangelicals” of whom Alan writes are eventually going to find their numbers declining a la the mainline Protestant churches. When the Gospel and solid Biblical teaching are abandoned in the pursuit of a social “gospel,” people end up seeking the real thing elsewhere.


98 posted on 09/04/2008 9:08:10 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
These are people who disagree with Barack Obama's position on abortion but respect him as a Christian.

These are the people who are really not evangelical but who are active memebers of pop christianity. They are not sufficiently schooled in the faith to recognize that Obama is not a Christian.

99 posted on 09/04/2008 9:08:44 AM PDT by tbpiper (Obama/Biden: Instead of Ebony and Ivory, we have Arrogance and Insolence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl

You must be a neat lady to be compared to our Sarah Pelin.

Actually, she is much like many women, and 52% of us vote!


100 posted on 09/04/2008 9:09:23 AM PDT by JFC (McCain/Palin 08 BASE IS RALLIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson