is to 
is to
Posted on 09/03/2008 9:59:50 PM PDT by Pinkbell
is to is to
Throw his sister into the mix and I’d have to say that the offspring of Ron and Nancy Reagan have nothing in common with their parents. Nature VS. Nurture is always a spirited debate. Michael Reagan is more like his father than both of Nancy’s kids combined. Ron would be proud of Michael. Not so much Ron, Jr., and Patti.
Yeah, like I’d ever believe anything that guy says.
Jr. traded in his tutu for a microphone when the media offered him some money if he were willing to trash his dad’s legacy. Apparently, the he inherited neither the brains or the tongue of The Gipper. Michael, who has no genetic connection, is more like the great president than Jr. could ever hope to be.
Taking drugs in one’s youth does terrible things to the brain.
And the knowledge that you can never live up to your father’s character makes you bitter.
Weel, he was never his father’s son, anyway, so his opinion just doesn’t matter!
Great men should not have sons
Little Ronnie Tutu strikes again. One, two, three strikes, he’s out.
Ron Junior. Huh.... I had forgotten all about him.
I wonder if he and Obama have ever been... you know.... friendly?
The late great George Washington set the example in more ways than one.
Ron Jr. was never a conservative.
Ronald Prescott Reagan is no Ronald Wilson Reagan, Jr.
Secretariat had some sons who were slow. Looks like poor Reagan did, too.
Yes, I've heard that rumor. I also heard that that little girl was placed with an ordinary family in the heart of distant Alaska, in a little town called Wasilla, only to emerge when her country needed her to pull a sword from a stone and lead them . . .
Delusional ravings of a failed ballerina.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.