Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
This rumor is nonsense. If the girl is 5 months pregnant and the baby is 7 months old, how could it possibly be true? Yet in view of the utterly stupid move by the Palin family to have the girl and the alleged father at the Republican convention, will cause people to pause and think maybe there is something to it.

I have difficulty relating to parents who expose their teenage daughter to the media frenzy. I would never to that a daughter of mine no matter how disgusted I might be with her behavior. And imagine inviting the guy who got her pregnant to sit with them as if to say, "Look at us." Some people use body art, the Palin used the pregnancy.

This turns the convention into a circus and acts as a distraction. Maybe that is the purpose?

341 posted on 09/03/2008 4:56:27 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: apocalypto

Knock off the crap. Maybe you should join the rats and the MSM with this slander. The ‘alleged Father’ is more accurately the ‘known fiance’. And YES they were engaged BEFORE the pregnancy troll. He has every RIGHT to stand up next to his FIANCE!


343 posted on 09/03/2008 5:03:57 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

To: apocalypto

“I have difficulty relating to parents who expose their teenage daughter to the media frenzy.”

Thank you.

One thing that really bothers me is some people are supporting putting the family through this because it might help defeat Obama. Pathetic.


354 posted on 09/03/2008 6:28:42 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida (Write in Thomas Sowell - A true Conservative. No more dopey RINOs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson