Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: apocalypto

Knock off the crap. Maybe you should join the rats and the MSM with this slander. The ‘alleged Father’ is more accurately the ‘known fiance’. And YES they were engaged BEFORE the pregnancy troll. He has every RIGHT to stand up next to his FIANCE!


343 posted on 09/03/2008 5:03:57 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]


To: conservativegramma
Name calling, you sound like a typical of liberals and John McCain supporters, and like you need a dose of Valium. I have no way of knowing if he is the father or not, just what I read in the reports. That is why the use of the word "alleged." One can also say "reported." It is done all the time to avoid lawsuits, indicated lack of proof, and so on. There was also a picture of a black dude, 16, posted on FR as the possible father.

I never the said the guy does not have the RIGHT, I just think it is a very bad decision for many reasons that should be obvious: the stress on the girl, the diversion, the implication that this is something to be proud of, a slap in the face of family values.

Since she is already 5 months pregnant and they were allegedly engaged before she got pregnant, it is obvious he has been dragging his feet re marriage.

345 posted on 09/03/2008 5:20:31 AM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson